Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request]: Consider creating new content re: common mistakes agencies make in writing proposals for professional software services #690

Open
2 of 9 tasks
ameliaswong opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Guides Initiative 2 Tracks work for "Improving the Maintainability of the 18F Guides and Methods"

Comments

@ameliaswong
Copy link
Contributor

A description of the work

De-risking Guide 2.0 includes a section on the "Rationalized, competitive award process." The section closes by noting that if vendors are requesting more narrative space for a proposal, it may indicate that "The government’s request was poorly written and is confusing to potential bidders."

During content testing of the guide, a state employee suggested: "it may be helpful to link to "common mistakes" agencies make in written proposals. I understand that a lengthy vendor response indicates I put out a bad proposal, but it doesn't help me understand why the proposal was bad and how to correct it."

Context: When the FFS Team revised the De-risking Guide, it kept a list of backlog items for possibly addressing in future iterations. As the project lead during close-out, I transferred that list to the Guides repo.

Point of contact on this issue

Amelia Wong or Laura Poncé

Reproduction steps (if necessary)

No response

Skills Needed

  • Any Human
  • Design
  • Content
  • Engineering
  • Acquisition
  • Product
  • Other

Does this need to happen in the next 2 weeks?

  • Yes
  • No

How much time do you anticipate this work taking?

A few weeks

Acceptance Criteria

This ticket would involve:

  • assessing the utility of the requested content by having conversations with relevant 18F staff (starting with Acq) to decide if content on common mistakes in proposals should be developed/added (or if an existing resource could be linked to from the DRG)
  • if no, you're done.
  • if yes, the next step is figuring out what should be said or linked to with relevant 18F staff input
  • if new content is needed, writing/editing content
  • notifying TTS Outreach of changes to see if new content requires going through GSA concurrence
  • going through GSA concurrence, if needed
  • publishing
@ameliaswong ameliaswong added Initiative 2 Tracks work for "Improving the Maintainability of the 18F Guides and Methods" Guides labels Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Guides Initiative 2 Tracks work for "Improving the Maintainability of the 18F Guides and Methods"
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant