You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I used your code and changed the stride to 2 for faster computation.
I ran the training three times and got the following results in different runs:
Run1: mAP 74.2, cmc1: 86.1
Run2: mAP 64.7 cmc1: 80.5
Run3: mAP 75.2 cmc1: 87.5
As you see, in the second run the map and cmc1 dropped by large amount. I am not sure what is the reason for this.
Do you think this is because of the random erasing being used?
Have you also observed a large variation in results across different trainings?
Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I used your code and changed the stride to 2 for faster computation.
I ran the training three times and got the following results in different runs:
Run1: mAP 74.2, cmc1: 86.1
Run2: mAP 64.7 cmc1: 80.5
Run3: mAP 75.2 cmc1: 87.5
As you see, in the second run the map and cmc1 dropped by large amount. I am not sure what is the reason for this.
Do you think this is because of the random erasing being used?
Have you also observed a large variation in results across different trainings?
Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: