Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merging type records from predecessor blocks (not backward jumped) #74

Open
Constellation opened this issue Jul 8, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Merging type records from predecessor blocks (not backward jumped) #74

Constellation opened this issue Jul 8, 2012 · 1 comment
Labels
optimize
Milestone
Breaker Project

Comments

@Constellation
Copy link
Owner

We should merge type records from predecessor blocks.

A;
if (cond)
    B;
C;

We should merge A and B type record and provide merged type record to C.
@Constellation
Copy link
Owner Author

First, we add mutated flag to TypeRecord and hold their database (unordered_map) as shapred_ptr.
And if branched target modify TypeRecord, we split out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
optimize
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Breaker Project
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Constellation