Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Service time out #27

Open
radhuria opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Service time out #27

radhuria opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@radhuria
Copy link

We have IBMi LPAR being monitored by Nagios. every now and then we face the see the below issue. Please suggest

Notification details:
(Service check timed out after 91.01 seconds)

@williamlea1
Copy link

Hi, is this a recent thing and it was ok before?

Also I take it you have already changed the service_check_timeout in core config from 60 to 90.?
We upgraded to 5.8.8 and noticed an increase in timeouts.

Cheers Will.

@radhuria
Copy link
Author

radhuria commented Apr 12, 2022 via email

@williamlea1
Copy link

it might also be worth noting that depending on how many services that if one services starts to take a bit longer then that can have a knock on effect with other services also to trying run and if they are trying to access same tables then again it slows down more.

@radhuria
Copy link
Author

radhuria commented Apr 12, 2022 via email

@williamlea1
Copy link

as I said we have experienced more issues since we upgraded to 5.8.8. Before that we had the timeout value of 70 seconds and most of the time it sufficed but within hours of installing the upgrade I have had to up it to 120 seconds to cope. We did find that a Custom SQL service was exacerbating the situation and when turning that service off it improved but still not completely gone away. But certainly the upgrade has highlighted an issue we are looking into ourselves.

@radhuria
Copy link
Author

radhuria commented Apr 12, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants