Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Self Hosted Photo/Video Server Support #67

Open
boggsdabeast opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request: Self Hosted Photo/Video Server Support #67

boggsdabeast opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@boggsdabeast
Copy link

boggsdabeast commented Oct 21, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not really. Just love this tool and want to see it grow!!
Even though its not directly related to the Arr stack.... I'm looking at getting away from Google Photos and thought it might be good here for others as well who would like to host their own photo server

Describe the solution you'd like
Was looking at these items here: https://github.com/meichthys/foss_photo_libraries and leaning towards Immich but open to other or better suggestions

Additional context
In the cmd tool I suppose it could support more than one option but seems unnecessary

@boggsdabeast boggsdabeast changed the title Self Hosted Photo/Video Server Support Feature Request: Self Hosted Photo/Video Server Support Oct 21, 2024
@cgarrovillo
Copy link

Unrelated. Low effort request.

@Luctia
Copy link
Owner

Luctia commented Feb 16, 2025

I think I agree that this is a bit out of scope. The reason for starting this project is that many people seemed to have difficulty getting the services to work together with docker volumes and hardlinks etc. Since a photo hosting service wouldn't really have to work together with anything else in this repo (unless there's a *arr service for downloading photos that I haven't heard of), I don't think it would fall under this project. I'll leave this open for a bit to enable discussion but I'll probably close it soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants