We need to assign a license

[NicMcPhee]

We currently don't have a license file for this project, and we need one if this is going to actually be open source. I'd personally favor the MIT license, but there are tons of choices if people want to explore options.

[kklamberty]

I'd lean toward the MIT license as well, mostly based on the responses to
the survey I sent everyone in the class about their licensing preferences.
Everyone was interested in contributing their intellectual property to the
open source Scavengr. Most people just wanted to have credit listed there.
Some people didn't even care about credit.

Nobody cared (in the end) whether or not someone could use Scavengr to make
money. We needed to wait to heard from everyone on that issue, but looks
like we're all set in that regard.

Cheers,
KK

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Nic McPhee [email protected]:

We currently don't have a license file for this project, and we need one
if this is going to actually be open source. I'd personally favor the MIT
license, but there are tons of choices if people want to explore options.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/6
.