We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm playing with our package (qserv) setup using eups and I see something unexpected. qserv has ups/qserv.table file set correctly and it I try to do:
$ setup -r . $ echo $QSERV_DIR /usr/local/home/salnikov/qserv-master
which looks OK except that qserv puts its built stuff into build/dist directory. So I try:
$ setup -r build/dist -m ups/qserv.table $ echo $QSERV_DIR /usr/local/home/salnikov/qserv-master/ups
QSERV_DIR (and PATH, etc) point to ./ups/ instead of ./build/dist/ as I would expect. Should it be doing that? What I have also found is that
$ setup -r build/dist -m ups/qserv.table qserv $ echo $QSERV_DIR /usr/local/home/salnikov/qserv-master/build/dist
works better, it looks like I have to use package name if I specify both -r and -m (but it's not needed if only -r is specified).
Andy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
More detail, this is with:
$ eups -V EUPS Version: 1.3.0
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I'm playing with our package (qserv) setup using eups and I see something unexpected. qserv has ups/qserv.table file set correctly and it I try to do:
which looks OK except that qserv puts its built stuff into build/dist directory. So I try:
QSERV_DIR (and PATH, etc) point to ./ups/ instead of ./build/dist/ as I would expect. Should it be doing that?
What I have also found is that
works better, it looks like I have to use package name if I specify both -r and -m (but it's not needed if only -r is specified).
Andy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: