You are incorrectly presenting it as open source model while it is NOT!

[gnusupport]

System Info / 系統信息

You are incorrectly presenting it as open source model, this is the text from your website:

The ChatGLM3 open-source model aims to promote the development of large-model technology together with the open-source community. Developers and everyone are earnestly requested to comply with the open-source protocol, and not to use the open-source models, codes, and derivatives for any purposes that might harm the nation and society, and for any services that have not been evaluated and filed for safety. Currently, no applications, including web, Android, Apple iOS, and Windows App, have been developed based on the ChatGLM3 open-source model by our project team.

Though you are using proprietary license restricting users' freedom:
https://github.com/THUDM/ChatGLM3/blob/main/MODEL_LICENSE

References:

The Open Source Definition – Open Source Initiative:
https://opensource.org/osd

Good example for you:
Meta’s LLaMa 2 license is not Open Source – Open Source Initiative:
https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source

What is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

Who can help? / 谁可以帮助到您？

你错误地将它表述为开源模型，这是你网站上的文本：

ChatGLM3开源模型旨在与开源社区共同推动大型模型技术的发展。开发者及所有人诚挚请求遵守开源协议，不将开源模型、代码及其衍生产品用于任何可能危害国家与社会的用途，也不用于未经评估和安全审查的服务中。目前，我们的项目团队未开发过基于ChatGLM3开源模型的任何应用、包括网页、Android、苹果iOS和Windows应用。

尽管你在使用限制用户自由的专有许可：
https://github.com/THUDM/ChatGLM3/blob/main/MODEL_LICENSE

参考资料：

开源定义 – 开源倡议：
https://opensource.org/osd

对于你来说的好例子：
Meta的LLaMa2许可证并不属于开源 – 开源倡议：
https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source

什么是自由软件？ - GNU项目 - 自由软件基金会：
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

Information / 问题信息

• The official example scripts / 官方的示例脚本
• My own modified scripts / 我自己修改的脚本和任务

Reproduction / 复现过程

You are incorrectly presenting it as open source model, this is the text from your website:

Expected behavior / 期待表现

You should choose truly free software license, as if Qwen from Alibaba Group can make it, you can also do. If Microsoft can choose MIT license, you could do it too.

Otherwise as non-free software, this model will not get community's widespread use.