-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More abstract Worker responsibility #1213
Comments
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Jul 29, 2024
This is in prep to support generic layering of workers & schedulers. We can no longer know if the source is a client or just an up-stream-component, so we need to fall back to just using OperationId. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2024
This is in prep to support generic layering of workers & schedulers. We can no longer know if the source is a client or just an up-stream-component, so we need to fall back to just using OperationId. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
This is in prep to support generic layering of workers & schedulers. We can no longer know if the source is a client or just an up-stream-component, so we need to fall back to just using OperationId. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
This is in prep to support generic layering of workers & schedulers. We can no longer know if the source is a client or just an up-stream-component, so we need to fall back to just using OperationId. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
This is in prep to support generic layering of workers & schedulers. We can no longer know if the source is a client or just an up-stream-component, so we need to fall back to just using OperationId. towards #1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
Mostly a cosmetic change to move the compatible parts of ActionSchedulers to use ClientStateManager API instead and implement all related requirements to existing schedulers. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
Mostly a cosmetic change to move the compatible parts of ActionSchedulers to use ClientStateManager API instead and implement all related requirements to existing schedulers. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2024
These APIs were near identical and with the new scheduler/worker design we will be eventually removing the ActionScheduler API and moving it to the ClientStateManager API (eventually renamed). towards #1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2024
Mostly a cosmetic change to move the compatible parts of ActionSchedulers to use ClientStateManager API instead and implement all related requirements to existing schedulers. towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2024
) Mostly a cosmetic change to move the compatible parts of ActionSchedulers to use ClientStateManager API instead and implement all related requirements to existing schedulers. towards #1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2024
We want to phase out ActionScheduler in favor of ClientStateManager. In doing so, we need to have a way to let CapabilitiesServer know about platform properties; if we do this, it'd be a breaking change. Instead of causing a breaking change, we instead are going to make the provided scheduler allow the capabilities service query the optionally provided property provider interface and if it does not exist throw a warning and have it return an empty set (most RBE clients ignore this field anyway). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2024
We want to phase out ActionScheduler in favor of ClientStateManager. In doing so, we need to have a way to let CapabilitiesServer know about platform properties; if we do this, it'd be a breaking change. Instead of causing a breaking change, we instead are going to make the provided scheduler allow the capabilities service query the optionally provided property provider interface and if it does not exist throw a warning and have it return an empty set (most RBE clients ignore this field anyway). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2024
We want to phase out ActionScheduler in favor of ClientStateManager. In doing so, we need to have a way to let CapabilitiesServer know about platform properties; if we do this, it'd be a breaking change. Instead of causing a breaking change, we instead are going to make the provided scheduler allow the capabilities service query the optionally provided property provider interface and if it does not exist throw a warning and have it return an empty set (most RBE clients ignore this field anyway). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
to allada/nativelink-fork
that referenced
this issue
Aug 14, 2024
We want to phase out ActionScheduler in favor of ClientStateManager. In doing so, we need to have a way to let CapabilitiesServer know about platform properties; if we do this, it'd be a breaking change. Instead of causing a breaking change, we instead are going to make the provided scheduler allow the capabilities service query the optionally provided property provider interface and if it does not exist throw a warning and have it return an empty set (most RBE clients ignore this field anyway). towards TraceMachina#1213
allada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 14, 2024
…1260) We want to phase out ActionScheduler in favor of ClientStateManager. In doing so, we need to have a way to let CapabilitiesServer know about platform properties; if we do this, it'd be a breaking change. Instead of causing a breaking change, we instead are going to make the provided scheduler allow the capabilities service query the optionally provided property provider interface and if it does not exist throw a warning and have it return an empty set (most RBE clients ignore this field anyway). towards #1213
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently the "worker" component fills a few different roles:
In reality this needs to be split into a couple layers. Most importantly, we want to support the ability to have a different component that actually executes the work from the others. This will allow us to make custom
runner
backends that can execute intocontainerd
or another VM, run on host, or maybe even something more exotic, like SSH.Diagram example of new component layout:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: