Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: TailwindCSS v4 Support. #102

Open
1 task
rahul-vashishtha opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #104
Open
1 task

feat: TailwindCSS v4 Support. #102

rahul-vashishtha opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #104
Labels
✨ feature New feature or request

Comments

@rahul-vashishtha
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the feature

The documentation site for Inspira UI uses shadcn-docs-nuxt. I'm planning to add support for TailwindCSS v4 but unable to fully migrate as this layer is still TailwindCSS v3 based.

When are you planning to support TailwindCSS v4.

Additional information

  • Would you be willing to help implement this feature?
@rahul-vashishtha rahul-vashishtha added the ✨ feature New feature or request label Feb 13, 2025
@ZTL-UwU
Copy link
Owner

ZTL-UwU commented Feb 15, 2025

@rahul-vashishtha

I'll migrate to tailwind v4 in the v1 major (still using content v2, content v3 will be the v2 major).

Currently shadcn-vue has some problems in tailwind v4, and @nuxtjs/tailwindcss hasn't release v7 with tailwind v4 support, so a stable release might not be too soon.

While waiting for them to support tailwind v4, I'm working on a tailwind-v4 branch which works around all the issues and I will release it as a v1 beta (in #104) and we can migrate the inspira site to tailwind v4 before shadcn-vue and @nuxtjs/tailwindcss fully supports tailwind v4.

@ZTL-UwU ZTL-UwU linked a pull request Feb 15, 2025 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✨ feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants