Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image Schema is not fully represented on Schema Doc #2

Open
ciberch opened this issue Sep 3, 2012 · 3 comments
Open

Image Schema is not fully represented on Schema Doc #2

ciberch opened this issue Sep 3, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@ciberch
Copy link
Member

ciberch commented Sep 3, 2012

So I am working on a Cloud Foundry app that stores and resizes pictures with ImageMagick which can then be shared to the stream. I have the original photo, a stream sized photo and a thumbnail.
I went to the schema spec to lookup the latest JSON representation. I had a hard time finding it and even pinged Martin to help me look.
I cannot find the full representation here
http://activitystrea.ms/specs/json/schema/activity-schema.html

The net net is that the different Object Types are not linked from the top of the document or TOC as they used to a year ago as you can see here
http://activitystrea.ms/head/activity-schema.html

Overall the spec seems a bit confusing compared to what we had a while back that showed all the properties.
http://wiki.activitystrea.ms/w/page/23768198/Photo

@ciberch
Copy link
Member Author

ciberch commented Sep 3, 2012

Also why did we change "fullImages" to "fullImage" @jasnell ?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 3, 2012

Sorry, need some more detail. It's been fullImage for as long as I can
recall.
On Sep 3, 2012 9:10 AM, "Monica Wilkinson" [email protected] wrote:

Also why did we change "fullImages" to "fullImage" @jasnellhttps://github.com/jasnell?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2#issuecomment-8242147.

@ciberch
Copy link
Member Author

ciberch commented Sep 5, 2012

Well on the wiki page linked above its plural. How should publishers handle multiple sizes for image galleries for example ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants