Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request-Support for Custom Traffic Selectors in Virtual Gateway Connection #2063

Open
1 task done
mindaugas-musnikas-Devoteam opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mindaugas-musnikas-Devoteam

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

It would be highly beneficial to have support for custom traffic selectors in IPsec VPN connections within the terraform-azurerm-caf module. This feature would allow for more granular control over the traffic that is permitted through the VPN, enhancing security and flexibility.

Terraform AzureRM provider does support traffic_selector_policy since 3.5.0 (May 05, 2022) as per https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/developer/terraform/provider-version-history-azurerm

New or Affected Resource(s

azurerm_virtual_network_gateway_connection

Potential Configuration file

traffic_selector_policies = {
      traffic_selector_policy1 = {
        local_address_ranges = ["10.10.0.5"]
        remote_address_ranges = ["192.168.0.5"]
      }
      traffic_selector_policy2 = {
        local_address_ranges = ["10.10.0.6"]
        remote_address_ranges = ["192.168.0.6"]
      }
  }

References

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/developer/terraform/provider-version-history-azurerm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant