Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Effect of randomize_temperature on gFID of RAR #74

Open
RohollahHS opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Effect of randomize_temperature on gFID of RAR #74

RohollahHS opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@RohollahHS
Copy link

Hi,

Did you conduct any ablation studies on the effect of randomize_temperature on gFID? For instance, if you use a very low randomize_temperature (equivalent to argmax), does the gFID improve or worsen?

@cornettoyu
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

Thanks for your interests in our work. We have not tried that, but generally speaking, using "argmax" or very low temp should leads to a much worse gFID, since the diversity should be much worse.

@RohollahHS
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. I have developed a model whose gFID improves when I use argmax (temperature=0) but worsens when I use a high temperature. For example, I trained my model and the original MaskGIT (from your repo) on 100,000 images of imagenet (with each class containing 100 images). With temperature=0, my model achieves a gFID of about 10, whereas MaskGIT, with temperature=0, gets a gFID of about 50. However, when I use a higher temperature (like the one in the MaskGIT config file), the gFID of MaskGIT improves significantly to about 10, while the gFID of my model worsens to around 15.

I wanted to hear your thoughts on this. Do you think my model is generally better than MaskGIT (since it achieves much better results when temperature=0), or worse (since its results worsen when using a higher temperature, like 1)?

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants