You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Did you conduct any ablation studies on the effect of randomize_temperature on gFID? For instance, if you use a very low randomize_temperature (equivalent to argmax), does the gFID improve or worsen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your interests in our work. We have not tried that, but generally speaking, using "argmax" or very low temp should leads to a much worse gFID, since the diversity should be much worse.
Thanks for your reply. I have developed a model whose gFID improves when I use argmax (temperature=0) but worsens when I use a high temperature. For example, I trained my model and the original MaskGIT (from your repo) on 100,000 images of imagenet (with each class containing 100 images). With temperature=0, my model achieves a gFID of about 10, whereas MaskGIT, with temperature=0, gets a gFID of about 50. However, when I use a higher temperature (like the one in the MaskGIT config file), the gFID of MaskGIT improves significantly to about 10, while the gFID of my model worsens to around 15.
I wanted to hear your thoughts on this. Do you think my model is generally better than MaskGIT (since it achieves much better results when temperature=0), or worse (since its results worsen when using a higher temperature, like 1)?
Hi,
Did you conduct any ablation studies on the effect of
randomize_temperature
on gFID? For instance, if you use a very lowrandomize_temperature
(equivalent toargmax
), does the gFID improve or worsen?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: