We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am testing the very large basis set for small molecule. Each time my SCF can only run for 8 steps, then the calculation will be killed like OOM:
ABACUS v3.8.2 Atomic-orbital Based Ab-initio Computation at UStc Website: http://abacus.ustc.edu.cn/ Documentation: https://abacus.deepmodeling.com/ Repository: https://github.com/abacusmodeling/abacus-develop https://github.com/deepmodeling/abacus-develop Commit: 0d455cb (Thu Nov 7 10:08:20 2024 +0800) Tue Nov 12 17:38:24 2024 MAKE THE DIR : OUT.ABACUS/ RUNNING WITH DEVICE : CPU / Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum UNIFORM GRID DIM : 864 * 864 * 864 UNIFORM GRID DIM(BIG) : 216 * 216 * 216 DONE(71.6958 SEC) : SETUP UNITCELL DONE(72.3571 SEC) : INIT K-POINTS --------------------------------------------------------- Self-consistent calculations for electrons --------------------------------------------------------- SPIN KPOINTS PROCESSORS THREADS NBASE 1 Gamma 4 4 308 --------------------------------------------------------- Use Systematically Improvable Atomic bases --------------------------------------------------------- ELEMENT ORBITALS NBASE NATOM XC Cl 18s17p17d-6au 154 2 --------------------------------------------------------- Initial plane wave basis and FFT box --------------------------------------------------------- DONE(77.2381 SEC) : INIT PLANEWAVE ------------------------------------------- SELF-CONSISTENT : ------------------------------------------- START CHARGE : atomic DONE(252.931 SEC) : INIT SCF * * * * * * << Start SCF iteration. ITER ETOT/eV EDIFF/eV DRHO TIME/s GE1 -8.18827885e+02 0.00000000e+00 1.0112e-01 139.17 GE2 -8.18862826e+02 -3.49406469e-02 2.3170e-02 138.44 GE3 -8.18867751e+02 -4.92507973e-03 9.5219e-03 138.75 GE4 -8.18869501e+02 -1.75062999e-03 4.3400e-03 139.12 GE5 -8.18870165e+02 -6.63091835e-04 3.0995e-03 139.60 GE6 -8.18870635e+02 -4.70805126e-04 2.3152e-03 140.63 GE7 -8.18870793e+02 -1.57412850e-04 1.7121e-03 141.15 GE8 -8.18870831e+02 -3.85875513e-05 1.2741e-03 142.04
When I check the trajectory of memory cost, I find there is a significant increasing during the SCF iteration:
I guess there is some memory leak. Please find the input files below: Cl2-dimer.zip
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you make some tests? @kirk0830
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
I am testing the very large basis set for small molecule. Each time my SCF can only run for 8 steps, then the calculation will be killed like OOM:
When I check the trajectory of memory cost, I find there is a significant increasing during the SCF iteration:
I guess there is some memory leak. Please find the input files below:
Cl2-dimer.zip
Expected behavior
No response
To Reproduce
No response
Environment
No response
Additional Context
No response
Task list for Issue attackers (only for developers)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: