-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Performance Counters to track JNI handle counts, values. #9
Labels
enhancement
Proposed change to current functionality
java-interop
Runtime bridge between .NET and Java
Comments
jonpryor
added a commit
to jonpryor/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2016
When `JniRuntime.CreationOptions.DestroyRuntimeOnDispose` is true, `JavaVM::DestroyJavaVM()` will be invoked when the `JniRuntime` instance is disposed *or* finalized. `JreRuntime.CreateJreVM()` would *always* set `DestroyRuntimeOnDispose` to true, because it called `JNI_CreateJavaVM()`, so *of course* you'd want to destroy the Java VM, right? Which brings us to unit tests. I don't know of any "before all test fixtures run" and "after all test fixtures run" extension points, which means: 1. The JVM needs to be created implicitly, "on demand." 2. There's no good way to destroy the JVM created in (1) after all tests have finished executing. Which *really* means that the `JreRuntime` instance is *finalized*, which sets us up for the unholy trifecta of AppDomain unloads, finalizers, and JVM shutdown: For unknown reasons, ~randomly, when running the unit tests (e.g. `make run-tests`), the test runner will *hang*, indefinitely. Attaching `lldb` and triggering a backtrace shows the unholy trifecta: Finalization: thread dotnet#4: tid = 0x403831, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10, name = 'tid_1403' ... frame dotnet#10: 0x00000001001ccb4a mono64`mono_gc_run_finalize(obj=<unavailable>, data=<unavailable>) + 938 at gc.c:256 [opt] frame dotnet#11: 0x00000001001cdd4a mono64`finalizer_thread [inlined] finalize_domain_objects + 51 at gc.c:681 [opt] frame dotnet#12: 0x00000001001cdd17 mono64`finalizer_thread(unused=<unavailable>) + 295 at gc.c:730 [opt] JVM destruction: thread dotnet#4: tid = 0x403831, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10, name = 'tid_1403' frame #0: 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame dotnet#1: 0x00007fffa04d4728 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 767 frame dotnet#2: 0x000000010ba5bc76 libjvm.dylib`os::PlatformEvent::park() + 192 frame dotnet#3: 0x000000010ba38e32 libjvm.dylib`ParkCommon(ParkEvent*, long) + 42 frame dotnet#4: 0x000000010ba39708 libjvm.dylib`Monitor::IWait(Thread*, long) + 168 frame dotnet#5: 0x000000010ba398f0 libjvm.dylib`Monitor::wait(bool, long, bool) + 246 frame dotnet#6: 0x000000010bb3dca2 libjvm.dylib`Threads::destroy_vm() + 80 frame dotnet#7: 0x000000010b8fd665 libjvm.dylib`jni_DestroyJavaVM + 254 AppDomain unload: thread dotnet#37: tid = 0x4038fb, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame #0: 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame dotnet#1: 0x00007fffa04d4728 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 767 frame dotnet#2: 0x0000000100234a7f mono64`mono_os_cond_timedwait [inlined] mono_os_cond_wait(cond=0x0000000102016e50, mutex=0x0000000102016e10) + 11 at mono-os-mutex.h:105 [opt] frame dotnet#3: 0x0000000100234a74 mono64`mono_os_cond_timedwait(cond=0x0000000102016e50, mutex=0x0000000102016e10, timeout_ms=<unavailable>) + 164 at mono-os-mutex.h:120 [opt] frame dotnet#4: 0x0000000100234828 mono64`_wapi_handle_timedwait_signal_handle(handle=0x0000000000000440, timeout=4294967295, alertable=1, poll=<unavailable>, alerted=0x0000700000a286f4) + 536 at handles.c:1554 [opt] frame dotnet#5: 0x0000000100246370 mono64`wapi_WaitForSingleObjectEx(handle=<unavailable>, timeout=<unavailable>, alertable=<unavailable>) + 592 at wait.c:189 [opt] frame dotnet#6: 0x00000001001c832e mono64`mono_domain_try_unload [inlined] guarded_wait(timeout=4294967295, alertable=1) + 30 at appdomain.c:2390 [opt] frame dotnet#7: 0x00000001001c8310 mono64`mono_domain_try_unload(domain=0x000000010127ccb0, exc=0x0000700000a287a0) + 416 at appdomain.c:2482 [opt] frame dotnet#8: 0x00000001001c7db2 mono64`ves_icall_System_AppDomain_InternalUnload [inlined] mono_domain_unload(domain=<unavailable>) + 20 at appdomain.c:2379 [opt] frame dotnet#9: 0x00000001001c7d9e mono64`ves_icall_System_AppDomain_InternalUnload(domain_id=<unavailable>) + 46 at appdomain.c:2039 [opt] This randomly results in deadlock, and hung Jenkins bots. Fix this behavior by altering `JreRuntime.CreateJreVM()` to *not* override the value of `JniRuntime.CreationOptions.DestroyRuntimeOnDispose`. This allows the constructor of the `JreRuntime` instance to decide whether or not the JVM is destroyed. In the case of TestJVM, we *don't* want to destroy the JVM. This prevents the JVM from being destroyed, which in turn prevents the hang during process shutdown.
jonpryor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2016
When `JniRuntime.CreationOptions.DestroyRuntimeOnDispose` is true, `JavaVM::DestroyJavaVM()` will be invoked when the `JniRuntime` instance is disposed *or* finalized. `JreRuntime.CreateJreVM()` would *always* set `DestroyRuntimeOnDispose` to true, because it called `JNI_CreateJavaVM()`, so *of course* you'd want to destroy the Java VM, right? Which brings us to unit tests. I don't know of any "before all test fixtures run" and "after all test fixtures run" extension points, which means: 1. The JVM needs to be created implicitly, "on demand." 2. There's no good way to destroy the JVM created in (1) after all tests have finished executing. Which *really* means that the `JreRuntime` instance is *finalized*, which sets us up for the unholy trifecta of AppDomain unloads, finalizers, and JVM shutdown: For unknown reasons, ~randomly, when running the unit tests (e.g. `make run-tests`), the test runner will *hang*, indefinitely. Attaching `lldb` and triggering a backtrace shows the unholy trifecta: Finalization: thread #4: tid = 0x403831, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10, name = 'tid_1403' ... frame #10: 0x00000001001ccb4a mono64`mono_gc_run_finalize(obj=<unavailable>, data=<unavailable>) + 938 at gc.c:256 [opt] frame #11: 0x00000001001cdd4a mono64`finalizer_thread [inlined] finalize_domain_objects + 51 at gc.c:681 [opt] frame #12: 0x00000001001cdd17 mono64`finalizer_thread(unused=<unavailable>) + 295 at gc.c:730 [opt] JVM destruction: thread #4: tid = 0x403831, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10, name = 'tid_1403' frame #0: 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame #1: 0x00007fffa04d4728 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 767 frame #2: 0x000000010ba5bc76 libjvm.dylib`os::PlatformEvent::park() + 192 frame #3: 0x000000010ba38e32 libjvm.dylib`ParkCommon(ParkEvent*, long) + 42 frame #4: 0x000000010ba39708 libjvm.dylib`Monitor::IWait(Thread*, long) + 168 frame #5: 0x000000010ba398f0 libjvm.dylib`Monitor::wait(bool, long, bool) + 246 frame #6: 0x000000010bb3dca2 libjvm.dylib`Threads::destroy_vm() + 80 frame #7: 0x000000010b8fd665 libjvm.dylib`jni_DestroyJavaVM + 254 AppDomain unload: thread #37: tid = 0x4038fb, 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame #0: 0x00007fff9656bdb6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame #1: 0x00007fffa04d4728 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 767 frame #2: 0x0000000100234a7f mono64`mono_os_cond_timedwait [inlined] mono_os_cond_wait(cond=0x0000000102016e50, mutex=0x0000000102016e10) + 11 at mono-os-mutex.h:105 [opt] frame #3: 0x0000000100234a74 mono64`mono_os_cond_timedwait(cond=0x0000000102016e50, mutex=0x0000000102016e10, timeout_ms=<unavailable>) + 164 at mono-os-mutex.h:120 [opt] frame #4: 0x0000000100234828 mono64`_wapi_handle_timedwait_signal_handle(handle=0x0000000000000440, timeout=4294967295, alertable=1, poll=<unavailable>, alerted=0x0000700000a286f4) + 536 at handles.c:1554 [opt] frame #5: 0x0000000100246370 mono64`wapi_WaitForSingleObjectEx(handle=<unavailable>, timeout=<unavailable>, alertable=<unavailable>) + 592 at wait.c:189 [opt] frame #6: 0x00000001001c832e mono64`mono_domain_try_unload [inlined] guarded_wait(timeout=4294967295, alertable=1) + 30 at appdomain.c:2390 [opt] frame #7: 0x00000001001c8310 mono64`mono_domain_try_unload(domain=0x000000010127ccb0, exc=0x0000700000a287a0) + 416 at appdomain.c:2482 [opt] frame #8: 0x00000001001c7db2 mono64`ves_icall_System_AppDomain_InternalUnload [inlined] mono_domain_unload(domain=<unavailable>) + 20 at appdomain.c:2379 [opt] frame #9: 0x00000001001c7d9e mono64`ves_icall_System_AppDomain_InternalUnload(domain_id=<unavailable>) + 46 at appdomain.c:2039 [opt] This randomly results in deadlock, and hung Jenkins bots. Fix this behavior by altering `JreRuntime.CreateJreVM()` to *not* override the value of `JniRuntime.CreationOptions.DestroyRuntimeOnDispose`. This allows the constructor of the `JreRuntime` instance to decide whether or not the JVM is destroyed. In the case of TestJVM, we *don't* want to destroy the JVM. This prevents the JVM from being destroyed, which in turn prevents the hang during process shutdown.
jonpryor
added a commit
to jonpryor/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Oct 19, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (dotnet#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (dotnet#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request dotnet#6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request dotnet#2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request dotnet#1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers.
jonpryor
added a commit
to jonpryor/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Oct 19, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (dotnet#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (dotnet#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request dotnet#6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request dotnet#2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request dotnet#1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers.
jonpryor
added a commit
to jonpryor/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (dotnet#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (dotnet#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request dotnet#6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request dotnet#2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request dotnet#1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers. Use `LineEditor.pdb` by adding a post-`Build` target to `logcat-parse/Directory.Build.targets` which copies `LineEditor.pdb` into `$(OutputPath)`. This will allow the Xamarin.Android installer to include `LineEditor.pdb` into the installer packages.
jonpryor
added a commit
to jonpryor/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (dotnet#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (dotnet#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request dotnet#6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request dotnet#2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request dotnet#1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers. Add a post-`Build` target to `logcat-parse/Directory.Build.targets` which copies `LineEditor.pdb` into `$(OutputPath)`. This will allow the Xamarin.Android installer to include `LineEditor.pdb` into the installer packages.
jonpryor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request #6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request #2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request #1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers. Add a post-`Build` target to `logcat-parse/Directory.Build.targets` which copies `LineEditor.pdb` into `$(OutputPath)`. This will allow the Xamarin.Android installer to include `LineEditor.pdb` into the installer packages.
pjcollins
pushed a commit
to pjcollins/java.interop
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2020
Context: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_workitems/edit/1230070 Changes: mono/LineEditor@5a7e3e2...3fa0c2e * mono/LineEditor@3fa0c2e: Fix NuGet publishing errors (dotnet#9) * mono/LineEditor@06a4ddf: Bump `$(PackageVersion)` to 5.4.1. * mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f: Enable .pdb files for Release config & add AzDO build script (dotnet#8) * mono/LineEditor@4831e1a: Merge pull request dotnet#6 from terrajobst/code-of-conduct * mono/LineEditor@5b4a4aa: Link Code of Conduct * mono/LineEditor@410ca3d: Merge pull request dotnet#2 from VEIT-Electronics/master * mono/LineEditor@3d802e7: Merge pull request dotnet#1 from VEIT-Electronics/bugfix/ENG-232-line-editor-completions * mono/LineEditor@0d43552: fix: text overriding was only platform specific (check platform) The most important piece is mono/LineEditor@bce1b7f, which will allow us to redistribute `LineEditor.pdb` in the Xamarin.Android installers. Add a post-`Build` target to `logcat-parse/Directory.Build.targets` which copies `LineEditor.pdb` into `$(OutputPath)`. This will allow the Xamarin.Android installer to include `LineEditor.pdb` into the installer packages.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
Proposed change to current functionality
java-interop
Runtime bridge between .NET and Java
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: