You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding the article table to the region-based sharded cluster could be a good direction to take. We have multiple choices, either create a whole new key-space e.g. "articles", or add the article table to the users key-space, which will require to change name. Both options have to be considered, the first one seeming (for now) better in terms of scalability.
Articles will be fragmented depending on their category, for now we have 3 categories, 2 categories are located in 2 separated shards, but the 3rd category is supposed to be replicated across the 2 initial shards, which could potentially be an issue regarding the architecture of Vitess, some research needs to be done on the replication system of Vitess before moving forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Adding the article table to the region-based sharded cluster could be a good direction to take. We have multiple choices, either create a whole new key-space e.g. "articles", or add the article table to the users key-space, which will require to change name. Both options have to be considered, the first one seeming (for now) better in terms of scalability.
Articles will be fragmented depending on their category, for now we have 3 categories, 2 categories are located in 2 separated shards, but the 3rd category is supposed to be replicated across the 2 initial shards, which could potentially be an issue regarding the architecture of Vitess, some research needs to be done on the replication system of Vitess before moving forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: