You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 24, 2019. It is now read-only.
The machine readable, verbose index (?op=vindex&options=mr) should show signatures, just like the non machine readable index. I think this is only logical. (I like that you included signatures in the JSONFormat.)
I think this would be fine. SKS already emits a placeholder uat:::: record[1], which isn't in the draft spec. Clients should ignore record prefixes for those they're not equipped to handle.
How about: sig:<signing key ID>:<creation date>:<expiration date>:<flags>
The machine readable, verbose index (?op=vindex&options=mr) should show signatures, just like the non machine readable index. I think this is only logical. (I like that you included signatures in the JSONFormat.)
I hope this does not conflict with https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shaw-openpgp-hkp-00#section-5.2 that defines Machine Readable Indexes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: