-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for linux/arm64 for MPICH #565
Comments
Last time I checked, Intel MPI only worked in amd64 (the libraries cannot be found in other architectures). |
If MPICH doesn't support other platforms, we can close this issue. |
/retitle Add support for linux/arm64 and linux/ppc64le for MPICH |
I think it supports both amd64 and ppc64le, e.g. see: https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20381 |
I confirmed the MPICH works on the linux/arm64 platform using ytenzen/mpi-pi:test-mpich. $ kubectl get nodes --show-labels
NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION LABELS
kind-control-plane Ready control-plane 6m26s v1.27.1 beta.kubernetes.io/arch=arm64,beta.kubernetes.io/os=linux,kubernetes.io/arch=arm64... However, I can not confirm if the MPICH works on the linux/ppcle64 platform since I don't have the ppc64le environment. |
As this is marked for release 0.5.0, maybe ARM is enough for that and PPC support can be split to a separate ticket / to come later ? |
I agree. If you can verify the ppc64le, let me know the result. |
As you can see here (https://hub.docker.com/r/mpioperator/mpich-builder/tags), we have already been supported the linux/arm64 arch for the MPICH. So, closing this issue and creating the ppc64le supporting issue separately. |
/close |
@tenzen-y: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Opened: #660 |
Currently we support OpenMPI on amd64, arm64 and ppc64le, but Intel MPI and MPICH are only supported on amd64. It would be great if we had feature parity in that regard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: