Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What scale can mpi-operator support? #648

Open
yxzhao6 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

What scale can mpi-operator support? #648

yxzhao6 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@yxzhao6
Copy link

yxzhao6 commented Aug 30, 2024

We are building supercomputing infra for an internal GPU cluster up to thousands of expensive GPUs.
We are looking to adopt mpi-operator, or slurm.

slurm is widely adopted in large-scale hpc computing, so its scalability is well tested.

Is there cases of mpi-operator's benchmark results on > 3000 gpus clsuter?

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

@terrytangyuan @alculquicondor Do you have any benchmark results?

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Collaborator

At that scale, the limitations don't come from mpi-operator, but from the network and how pods will land on it.

Do you have more details?

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

Agreed. I don't think there's anything from the controller side that blocks the scale. I don't have any public benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants