-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Investigate API throttling in routes API calls #15
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
If folks have user stories on how bad the API throttling for routes controller is, that would be really helpful in determining the priority for this issue. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/lifecycle frozen |
/help |
@andrewsykim: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The Azure provider implemented caching in front of their routes interface to overcome API rate limiting (routes controller is extremely aggressive with the way it calls APIs), we should investigate if this is a common problem across providers (especially at larger scale) and come up with a common solution if it makes sense.
ref: kubernetes/kubernetes#60646
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: