You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We discovered another software 1 for the OpenWind devices that emits NMEA-0183 sentences using the $WIMWV identifier. Does it make sense to support it?
Example sentence:
$WIMWV,214.8,R,0.1,K
typeiNMEAMWVstruct {
MWVIdstring// $WIMWVWindAnglestring// 214.8 - 0 - 359TypeAnglestring// Relative - R True - TWindSpeedstring//0.1Unitsstring// N - knots - Kilometers/Metres/N KnotsStatusstring// A = valid V = invalidTerminationstring// CR LF - 0x0D 0x0A
}
MWV - Wind Speed and Angle
1 2 3 4 5
| | | | |
$--MWV,x.x,a,x.x,a*hh<CR><LF>
Field Number:
1) Wind Angle, 0 to 360 degrees
2) Reference, R = Relative, T = True
3) Wind Speed
4) Wind Speed Units, K/M/N
5) Status, A = Data Valid
6) Checksum
@UserMacUseface just shared those insights on this topic. Thanks!
VWR - Relative (Apparent) Wind Speed and Angle NMEA 0183 Sentences Not Recommended for New Designs Approved by the NMEA 0183 Standard Committee as of October 1, 2008 Wind angle in relation to the vessel's heading and wind speed measured relative to the moving vessel. The use of $--MWV is recommended.
We discovered another software 1 for the OpenWind devices that emits NMEA-0183 sentences using the
$WIMWV
identifier. Does it make sense to support it?Example sentence:
-- http://www.nmea.de/nmea0183datensaetze.html#mwv
Footnotes
https://www.openwind.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/RaspberryPi.zip ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: