We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
+
hi,
maybe similar to #69 :
pj -s '["item1"] + ["item2"]' # returns: (["item1"] + ["item2"]);
however in JS: (["item1"] + ["item2"]) yields item1item2 and the expected Python result is ["item1", "item2"]
(["item1"] + ["item2"])
item1item2
["item1", "item2"]
I guess the + should be interpreted as .concat() instead?
.concat()
thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks, should be as you said..and probably for the literal lists a specialization can be made...
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
hi,
maybe similar to #69 :
however in JS:
(["item1"] + ["item2"])
yieldsitem1item2
and the expected Python result is["item1", "item2"]
I guess the
+
should be interpreted as.concat()
instead?thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: