-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 511
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternative optional insulin remaining display #436
Comments
I‘m lost at this statement. You know how much you fill into the pod, you know your TDD / your insulin usage (of currently paired pod) respectively (can be checked via pod diagnostics) and you can then do X - Y. Unless you have wildly varying insulin needs between two pods, you should be able to note down that value a few pods on in a row and then use that number to fill It’s a bad idea to give users a false sense of information transparency based on guesstimated values, especially when it comes to insulin. FWIW, even the pod when displaying e.g. 45 U does not actually contain 45 U, but roughly +4 U of that. |
That makes sense.
You're right - making a change that does impact a large group of users that
can have a significant impact isn't a good idea. I'll take what you have
said and use that method. It was a feature I've always wanted but haven't
considered the adverse effects for others.
Thanks for clarifying it for me.
…On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 19:42, Deniz Cengiz ***@***.***> wrote:
For me it'd be a great feature to help manage the amount of insulin I use
so I can push the duration of my pod from two days out to the full three.
I‘m lost at this statement. You know how much you fill into the pod, you
know your TDD / your insulin usage (of currently paired pod) respectively
(can be checked via pod diagnostics) and you can then do X - Y. Unless you
have wildly varying insulin needs between two pods, you should be able to
note down that value a few pods on in a row and then use that number to fill
subsequent pods. Even easier than that would be to just do TDD x 3 + Y%
(for wiggle room).
It’s a bad idea to give users a false sense of information transparency
based on guesstimated values, especially when it comes to insulin. FWIW,
even the pod when displaying e.g. 45 U does not actually contain 45 U, but
roughly +4 U of that.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4DNWPJTGGCWZTLX42FKNXTZ6M5FXAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ7O4AS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJRGUZDAOJSG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
The information you are seeking is already available at your fingertips. That’s why I am lost at your idea. All the data you need to save pods and know how much insulin to fill them with is available. Please be so kind as to explain it further instead of being defensive and throwing sarcasm at me. I’ll add some more background to my previous reply: Adding the factor of guesstimation and user input, when there can be a varying group of people filling and applying a pod for the actual T1 / Trio user, and a bunch of conditional logic on top of it, for a single pump option is a bad idea for safety concern and software design reasons, yes, in my opinion, as a developer. |
I wholeheartedly agree with @dnzxy last post on this point. It doesn’t belong in Trio itself but the submodules. Although I think this is a guesstimating feature that shouldn't be done. |
I must apologise. I wasn't being sarcastic and didnt mean for it to come
across that way at all.
I do appreciate your suggestion about the information at my fingertips -
perhaps my suggestion comes from a place of laziness and not wanting to do
the calculations. I didn't realise the amount of work it would take behind
the scenes, hence why I was thinking of it being a ‘small change’ if it
reads that way in my suggestion.
Given the amount of work involved as you've laid out and the risks the
feature creates, there would certainly be more risks than benefits. I think
time would be better spent on other improvements/features.
I appreciate the work that you and everyone else involved have and are
continue to do on Trio. It's amazing and a big improvement on iAPS.
Once again, I do apologise for how my reply came across.
…On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 20:29, Deniz Cengiz ***@***.***> wrote:
The information you are seeking is already available at your fingertips.
That’s why I am lost at your idea. All the data you need to save pods and
know how much insulin to fill them with is available. Please be so kind as
to explain it further instead of being defensive and throwing sarcasm at me.
I’ll add some more background to my previous reply: Adding the factor of
guesstimation and user input, when there can be a varying group of people
filling and applying a pod for the actual T1 / Trio user, and a bunch of
conditional logic on top of it, for a single pump option is a bad idea for
safety concern and software design reasons, yes, in my opinion, as a
developer.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4DNWPK2DGTGCKDBRUFKEGTZ6NCXTAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ7O4AS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJRGU4DIMBRGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
You are alright! It's not the amount of work that is the issue here. It's that the code that needs to change form this is in the modules, not Trio itself. But besides that, the guessing how much you much you injected into the pod is an issue. It's an inexact amount that the user needs to enter. But also can screw up, We cannot check that, or catch such a thing. So it's a false sense of security. Leading to more uncertainty than its doing good. I also wonder sometimes if I make it with the pod. But then I look at the amount delivered. and I know how much is in there from the begin. The amount remaining that the pod gives, is already the indication you seek, its also not that accurate, but to a certain amount (its always more imo). I believe this will lead to way more confusion then that it will solve. |
@bigolal007 NDSS will have ways around the 13 box limit for pods, particularly if your insulin needs exceed 200U in 3 days. Contact them and explain your situation and there will be a batter solution than using pens for a month. |
Really? I had no idea they'd be able to help - I thought it was only
through private health insurance. I'll have to give them a call tomorrow.
Thanks for the info!
…On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 17:39, dsut4392 ***@***.***> wrote:
@bigolal007 <https://github.com/bigolal007> NDSS will have ways around
the 13 box limit for pods, particularly if your insulin needs exceed 200U
in 3 days. Contact them and explain your situation and there will be a
batter solution than using pens for a month.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4DNWPK4IPRQQWZZXITYAKTZ7BRY3AVCNFSM6AAAAABQ7O4AS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJWGM2TONZUGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Unfortunately got immediately dismissed after explaining my situation and
told to contact Omnipod. I have one box left, and the limit resets in March.
…On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 17:39, dsut4392 ***@***.***> wrote:
@bigolal007 <https://github.com/bigolal007> NDSS will have ways around
the 13 box limit for pods, particularly if your insulin needs exceed 200U
in 3 days. Contact them and explain your situation and there will be a
batter solution than using pens for a month.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4DNWPK4IPRQQWZZXITYAKTZ7BRY3AVCNFSM6AAAAABQ7O4AS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJWGM2TONZUGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Could you guys maybe have the convo on discord or fb? Instead of the issue? Its not really meant for this, although I love that you guys are sharing info and such |
Sure thing. Sorry.
…On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 11:59, Sjoerd Bozon ***@***.***> wrote:
Could you guys maybe have the convo on discord or fb? Instead of the
issue? Its not really meant for this, although I love that you guys are
sharing info and such
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4DNWPNBIRBZMAC4HCOXHCLZ7FSXTAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ7O4AS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJYGQ4TIMJXGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not related.
Describe the solution you'd like
Having an optional display for the amount of insulin remaining for users on Omnipod Dash.
My suggestion would be to have an option at some point for the user to input the amount of insulin they have entered into the pod - perhaps once the pod attachment is confirmed (final screen). In the settings, you have the option to have either 50+U (default) displayed or the total amount of insulin e.g. 125U remaining. The proposed display can calculated by the user entering the amount of insulin e.g. 200U and subtracting the Total Delivery figure (in pod details). Obviously this suggestion wouldn't be 100% accurate (maybe +/- 5U) until it reaches the 50U left report by Omnipod. Warning messages would need to be included describing the feature being optional and it's potential inaccuracy based upon the user's initial input.
For me it'd be a great feature to help manage the amount of insulin I use so I can push the duration of my pod from two days out to the full three. In Australia, I'm limited to 13 boxes of pods for the year since I was approved, so at the moment I need to use pens for a month or two so as to not reach my limit approved by my private health insurance to paying the $200+ for each box.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I haven't been able to come up with an alternative.
Additional context
I have proposed this in the discord channel, and another use expressed that they would like this feature as well. I can't remember if a decision was made by any of the developers.
Technical Details
I don't believe this would have any effect on the functionality of the app other than display.
User Impact
There's no issue at the moment. It would be a nice optional feature to have but certainly won't change my mind in using Trio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: