Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: closures intentionally not captured under function.inner/outer ? #527

Open
alex-tdrn opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@alex-tdrn
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I noticed that neither c++ nor rust closures are being captured under function.inner/outer. Is this an intentional design decision? Otherwise I could contribute the missing captures to fill this gap. I personally like to treat closure types the same way as regular functions but if that's not intended for the project that's also fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant