You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most (if not all) IACTs call the distance from the reconstructed gamma-ray position to the suspected source position theta, in wobble observation mode, background regions are used and this results in theta_off_* attributes.
The current version of the standard calls the distance of the reconstructed source position to the camera center THETA.
I think we should disambiguate this by adding subscripts like _FOV, _OBJ, _SRC, _ON, _OFF_*
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the spec, given that these formats are in use and implemented in several IRF exporters and science tools, there is a cost to changing axis names for consistency.
I'm putting this on v0.3 milestone, not for the v0.2 which we should try to finish up in the next days.
Most (if not all) IACTs call the distance from the reconstructed gamma-ray position to the suspected source position
theta
, in wobble observation mode, background regions are used and this results intheta_off_*
attributes.The current version of the standard calls the distance of the reconstructed source position to the camera center
THETA
.I think we should disambiguate this by adding subscripts like
_FOV
,_OBJ
,_SRC
,_ON
,_OFF_*
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: