-
Dear MMDet contributors, First, on behalf of the MMDet team, thanks for the support along these years. We find that the community has enthusiasm about supporting YOLOX of MMDetection. And there is already a PR to support the inference in #5656. Considering that, we plan to open a discussion about YOLOX here, including any discussion in the implementation process, the decomposition of the modules, and the role of each contributor. Thanks again, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
At first glance, the original YOLOX implementation differs from mmdet's style (e.g., To my current understanding, tasks can be divided as below:
In my opinion, it is better to release inference code first because it enables the community to use the backbone and neck; and to benchmark inference speed (YOLOX vs. other detectors, MMDet repo vs. YOLOX repo) and improve speed. Please note that it will be important to benchmark and keep inference speed in refactoring. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateWe have reimplemented YOLOX based on #5705. Training result of YOLOX tiny is:
The next step is to divide the huge PR into different parts of modules. The divide of work has been updated in https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmdetection/projects/2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Update
We have reimplemented YOLOX based on #5705.
Training result of YOLOX tiny is: