You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My detection model has two heads, one for the localization and the other for the classification. However, I found that it's hard to get both of them to be good.
For example, during the training, the classification metric (top-1 acc.) started to decline (overfitting) but the localization metric (IoU) was still rising (underfitting), resulting in a fluctuating detection performance (mAP).
Is there any good solution for this? I found adjusting the learning rates or the number of parameters of the two heads didn't work well.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
My detection model has two heads, one for the localization and the other for the classification. However, I found that it's hard to get both of them to be good.
For example, during the training, the classification metric (top-1 acc.) started to decline (overfitting) but the localization metric (IoU) was still rising (underfitting), resulting in a fluctuating detection performance (mAP).
Is there any good solution for this? I found adjusting the learning rates or the number of parameters of the two heads didn't work well.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions