New formula for wasmtime-c-api or extend existing wasmtime formula? #2248
Unanswered
eviltwin
asked this question in
Writing Formulae/Casks
Replies: 1 comment
-
If it's akin to Python bindings for a C library, then it should be part of the same formula and not a separate one. Feel free to open a PR to extend the existing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm looking at doing some development using wasmtime's c api. It's part of the same git repository as the main wasmtime package but is built and installed with a separate command as shown in their docs.
So my question is should I be creating a new formula and submitting that for review or should I extend the existing wasmtime package in some way?
(note that the C API is a completely optional part of wasmtime and, since wasmtime is written in rust, is more akin to something like python bindings for a c library...)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions