-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make spinning up peeringdb-py fully automated #65
Comments
+1 |
Not automated, but in case useful to others, these are the install & upgrade steps we use at the SeattleIX for peeringdb-py: https://lists.peeringdb.com/pipermail/pdb-tech/2022-September/000444.html |
+1 |
@peeringdb/pc Need another vote please. |
+1
…On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:11 Matt Griswold ***@***.***> wrote:
@peeringdb/pc <https://github.com/orgs/peeringdb/teams/pc> Need another
vote please.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#65 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFA2YQV3VQAP27TFVRMGPDTWDFSY7ANCNFSM5Z7V6EMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
This should be able to use the container from peeringdb/peeringdb#1274 with a few minor modifications and some documentation. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
To improve the experience for heavy users and to better manage costs, we should make it as easy as possible to install, configure, and synchronize peeringdb-py.
Who is affected by the problem?
What is the impact?
Happier users and more control over operational costs.
Are there security concerns?
There should not be.
Are there privacy concerns?
No.
Describe the solution you'd like
The user should be able to run a simple script that will install peeringdb-py and guide them through the configuration and synchronization.
Do you think this feature will require a formal design?
Probably.
Describe alternatives you've considered
We looked at deploying on a CDN but that would have meant extra cost and PeeringDB's data is not CDN cache friendly.
Could this feature request need support from the Admin Committee?
It should not.
What is the proposed priority?
Medium.
Provide a rationale for any/all of the above
This should make many heavy users happy. It should also help PeeringDB as an organization manage costs more effectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: