Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(docs): add description to deprecated props on refine component #6351

Conversation

alicanerdurmaz
Copy link
Member

@alicanerdurmaz alicanerdurmaz commented Sep 18, 2024

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

Bugs / Features

What is the current behavior?

There is no explanation of what to use instead of deprecated props.

What is the new behavior?

added description of what to use instead of deprecated props

@alicanerdurmaz alicanerdurmaz requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 11:39
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 62e7478

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@refine-bot refine-bot temporarily deployed to deploy-preview-website-6351 September 18, 2024 12:02 Inactive
@BatuhanW BatuhanW merged commit 692500b into master Sep 19, 2024
10 checks passed
@BatuhanW BatuhanW deleted the feat/docs/add-description-to-deprecated-props-on-refine-component branch September 19, 2024 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants