Manifesto - Table of contents

[antleblanc]

Hi!

A recent tweet mentioned following information:

GitHub now automatically creates a table of contents for your README.md files from your headers.

Original tweets:

https://twitter.com/github/status/1376636651963842562?s=21

https://twitter.com/natfriedman/status/1375430850620256257

From the Manifesto page, it says:

Create a table of contents (…)

Do you think that the Manifesto could be updated and stop mentioning the Table of contents anymore?

Thank you!

[Richienb]

With that said, should we remove the contents section in the awesome readme in favour of the TOC?

[skyTech-max]

Yeah I agree with you.... On Apr 9, 2021 10:59, "Richie Bendall" ***@***.***> wrote: With that said, should we remove the contents section in the awesome readme in favour of the TOC? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1972 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASPGSRIKNQL3IXTP3N55UDLTH2XWXANCNFSM4Z4CF7JA> .

[morinted]

I personally find the table of contents marker harder to find than the Contents section. Anyone who isn't familiar with GitHub won't spot that little hamburger menu.

[sindresorhus]

For now, at least, I prefer to keep the manual TOCs. We can reconsider this at a later point.

[d-wasserman]

I see the value in manual TOCs, but we are already seeing errors in some awesome-lists that result from them (minor lint error in PR #2011 for example). Maintenance might be a long term issue with manual ones.

[ROKONUJJAMA]

https://www.fiverr.com/share/3vkpLa

[NasirAlbani]

Hi! I am new here

[Jogai]

@jcbhmr its not legible in dark mode

[jcbhmr]

@Jogai you're absolutely right! Good catch 👍

Alternative image that I think works:

↖️ Click for TOC

light mode:

dark mode:

[Shishir1418]

🥰