You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can you please explain the reasoning behind including archived optimizers to measure the ANNECS score? The cited line of code implies that even if an environment passes the MC for the active agents, it is not counted in ANNECS unless it passes MC for the archived agents and that too without finetuning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I too am running into similar confusion. After carefully reviewing the code, I think that it is consistent with section 3.1 of the ePOET paper and section 3 paragraph 4 of the POET paper. However, I don't see how figure 8 was generated by ANNECS measures generated by this code. Using this code, the ANNECS measure should be zero for however many POET iterations are necessary to increase the population to the maximum number of environments, forcing the oldest into the archive. At which point the ANNECS measure can be incremented. But the ANNECS measures in the figure appear to start increasing with the first POET iterations.
Hi,
Can you please explain the reasoning behind including archived optimizers to measure the ANNECS score? The cited line of code implies that even if an environment passes the MC for the active agents, it is not counted in ANNECS unless it passes MC for the archived agents and that too without finetuning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: