You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist.
Try alternative boot mode
Yes. I have tried them, but the bug still exist.
BIOS Mode
UEFI Mode
Partition Style
GPT
Disk Capacity
64GB
Disk Manufacturer
No response
Image file checksum (if applicable)
None
Image file download link (if applicable)
No response
What happened?
New Linux Remount Feature makes partitions on USB device accessible via alternative locations (/dev/mapper/xxx). Unfortunately, it relies solely on partition names (i.e. /dev/sda1 will be accessible as /dev/mapper/sda1). Such a naming scheme is inflexible. As partition names in Linux are assigned dynamically, the name can be different depending on where USB device is plugged in. Compare this with having well-known and stable identifier. For example, on many modern Linux systems partitions are accessible under /dev/disk/by-label by their label. Should one have some automation script that reads from USB, it won't have to care about the partition name (which is unknown in advance).
VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT worked transparently and one shouldn't know the partition name. Now that it doesn't work, one have to either manually remove devices mapped by Ventoy (i.e. dmsetup remove ventoy; dmsetup remove sda1) or use hardcoded partition name (/dev/mapper/sda1). Please consider providing a location which doesn't depend on the partition name (ideally, based on the partition label).
BTW, I don't find the name "Linux Remount Feature" especially good. It is confusing and doesn't reflect what is actually happening under the hood. It really should be something like "Partition Mapping/Remapping" or even "Partition Aliasing".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There should have exist link in /dev/disk/by-label which point to the original /dev/XXX, so we can not use /dev/disk/by-label
This is understandable.
Didn't you think about adopting the existing naming scheme in Linux, e.g. /dev/mapper/ventoy/by-label for exposing partitions by label? It is hierarchical and future-proof. The naming is familiar to users too.
Official FAQ
Ventoy Version
1.1.02
What about latest release
Yes. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist.
Try alternative boot mode
Yes. I have tried them, but the bug still exist.
BIOS Mode
UEFI Mode
Partition Style
GPT
Disk Capacity
64GB
Disk Manufacturer
No response
Image file checksum (if applicable)
None
Image file download link (if applicable)
No response
What happened?
New Linux Remount Feature makes partitions on USB device accessible via alternative locations (
/dev/mapper/xxx
). Unfortunately, it relies solely on partition names (i.e./dev/sda1
will be accessible as/dev/mapper/sda1
). Such a naming scheme is inflexible. As partition names in Linux are assigned dynamically, the name can be different depending on where USB device is plugged in. Compare this with having well-known and stable identifier. For example, on many modern Linux systems partitions are accessible under/dev/disk/by-label
by their label. Should one have some automation script that reads from USB, it won't have to care about the partition name (which is unknown in advance).VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT
worked transparently and one shouldn't know the partition name. Now that it doesn't work, one have to either manually remove devices mapped by Ventoy (i.e.dmsetup remove ventoy; dmsetup remove sda1
) or use hardcoded partition name (/dev/mapper/sda1
). Please consider providing a location which doesn't depend on the partition name (ideally, based on the partition label).BTW, I don't find the name "Linux Remount Feature" especially good. It is confusing and doesn't reflect what is actually happening under the hood. It really should be something like "Partition Mapping/Remapping" or even "Partition Aliasing".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: