Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

transparently switch between CWA and OWA #60

Open
chiarcos opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

transparently switch between CWA and OWA #60

chiarcos opened this issue Mar 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
Category: related standards For RDF-related standards

Comments

@chiarcos
Copy link

As the parallel with graphs seems to be a driving force in current discussions, a conceptual difference is the open world assumption of RDF in opposition of the closed world assumption that graph databases (well, databases in general) normally adopt.

In a web context, we should preserve the OWA as the default interpretation, but for use cases beyond web metadata, a lot of energy (and triples) can be saved if we can explicitly assert that a graph from a particular source is complete with respect to the properties it provides for the individuals that it contains. This would unleash advantages for reasoning and search and lead to more compact code.

@dbooth-boston dbooth-boston added the Category: related standards For RDF-related standards label Mar 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Category: related standards For RDF-related standards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants