Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update RFC 2119 keyword usage #170

Closed
afs opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #171
Closed

Update RFC 2119 keyword usage #170

afs opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #171
Assignees
@afs
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Nov 26, 2024

At the moment it is in explicit markup <em class="rfc2119" title="Keyword in RFC 2119 context">MUST</em> but could be simply MUST etc because ReSpec handles it.
@afs afs self-assigned this Nov 26, 2024
@afs afs added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Nov 26, 2024
@afs afs mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2024
Merged
@afs afs closed this as completed in #171 Nov 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@afs afs

Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use ReSpec for RFC 2119 keywords w3c/sparql-query
1 participant
@afs