You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Occasionally, visitors to wpt.fyi identify patterns in the datasets which indicate problems with the results collection process. They may file an issue against this project under the assumption that the results collection code is maintained here. Although today, this small mistake does not lead to much inefficiency (and may be partially mitigated by carefully placed documentation), I think it may become more confusing as more independent projects begin contributing results.
The results receiver already supports the concept of an "uploader"--an account with a name and password. If this were extended with a "contact" e-mail address and (where possible) a "report issue" URL, then wpt.fyi could provide more direct assistance to those who want to improve the results.
In a future iteration, we could use this same data to showcase the collaborative nature of the project. Text like, "the following teams have contributed results in the past month: [...]" would give all involved a warm and fuzzy feeling about their participation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Occasionally, visitors to wpt.fyi identify patterns in the datasets which indicate problems with the results collection process. They may file an issue against this project under the assumption that the results collection code is maintained here. Although today, this small mistake does not lead to much inefficiency (and may be partially mitigated by carefully placed documentation), I think it may become more confusing as more independent projects begin contributing results.
The results receiver already supports the concept of an "uploader"--an account with a name and password. If this were extended with a "contact" e-mail address and (where possible) a "report issue" URL, then wpt.fyi could provide more direct assistance to those who want to improve the results.
In a future iteration, we could use this same data to showcase the collaborative nature of the project. Text like, "the following teams have contributed results in the past month: [...]" would give all involved a warm and fuzzy feeling about their participation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: