From 07b278c60e0ce28daf01d51fb1de9e4ebfdda29e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Maxime=20=E2=80=9Cpep=E2=80=9D=20Buquet?= Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:50:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] XEP-0019: Fix mismatched bylaws link MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Maxime “pep” Buquet --- xep-0019.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xep-0019.xml b/xep-0019.xml index 2d554872e..b7d91f111 100644 --- a/xep-0019.xml +++ b/xep-0019.xml @@ -78,6 +78,6 @@
  • Continue to use the Standards SIG as the preferred forum for discussion of experimental specifications before they are submitted to the XMPP Council.
  • If the Standards SIG cannot reach a working consensus on a given topic, let the document author(s) continue to rework their proposal informally outside the context of the Standards SIG. One option would be to send interested parties off to their own ad-hoc mailing list (e.g., on JabberStudio, http://www.jabberstudio.org/). Unlike the current SIGs, such a list would be established on the initiative of the document author(s) and would not require any formal approval by the XMPP Council.
  • -

    There may be value in bringing back specialized SIGs in the future when the Jabber/XMPP community becomes larger. However, at this time I urge that we face the facts and proactively implement the solution I have outlined in this document. Lest there be any concern that disbanding the SIGs is outside the power or purview of the XMPP Council, I note that Section 8.2 of the Bylaws of the XMPP Standards Foundation states in part that "The XMPP Council or the Members of the Corporation may, by resolution, ... terminate a Special Interest Group at any time for any reason." (An electronic copy of the Bylaws may be found at http://www.jabber.org/bylaws.html.)

    +

    There may be value in bringing back specialized SIGs in the future when the Jabber/XMPP community becomes larger. However, at this time I urge that we face the facts and proactively implement the solution I have outlined in this document. Lest there be any concern that disbanding the SIGs is outside the power or purview of the XMPP Council, I note that Section 8.2 of the Bylaws of the XMPP Standards Foundation states in part that "The XMPP Council or the Members of the Corporation may, by resolution, ... terminate a Special Interest Group at any time for any reason." (An electronic copy of the Bylaws may be found at https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/bylaws/.)

    From 98f757fa2413d970cec529fc6093e47976119f41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Maxime=20=E2=80=9Cpep=E2=80=9D=20Buquet?= Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:34:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] XEP-0019: Update revision to 1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Maxime “pep” Buquet --- xep-0019.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xep-0019.xml b/xep-0019.xml index b7d91f111..613d179f8 100644 --- a/xep-0019.xml +++ b/xep-0019.xml @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ N/A &stpeter; - 1.1 + 1.0.1 2022-11-03 pep Replaced shtml link. From 508a85479771c863199961b70b92df055ce28539 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Maxime=20=E2=80=9Cpep=E2=80=9D=20Buquet?= Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:37:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] XEP-0148: Update revision to 1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Maxime “pep” Buquet --- xep-0148.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xep-0148.xml b/xep-0148.xml index 4c5271d76..407a0ac51 100644 --- a/xep-0148.xml +++ b/xep-0148.xml @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ iq-iq &stpeter; - 1.1 + 1.0.1 2022-11-03 pep

    Replace shtml link