-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some barcodes can't be checked with our library #48
Comments
Hi, I tried to reproduce this issue with the following outcome:
To conclude, these might be just some bad prints on the packaging but not a general problem. |
I can confirm that the barcode on side of package of "Hotgen" tests is scannable, but it takes a while / some trying. |
Same here, scanning works of Hotgen works but needs good lighting (sunlight works very good), contrast of black on lightbrown might be the issue. |
fwiw, the title on the linked issue isn't exactly the cause of the problem, more a bit of an issue with clarity. I strongly suspect there are some processing improvements that could be made either inside quagga, or outside and then pass the resulting image to quagga to decode, as well as finding that different settings can often make for a very large difference in the quality of results. I'm glad to see another project that is making use of quagga2! I have the unfortunate situation where my application reads almost exclusively UPC/EAN13 codes and the decoder for those seems to do very, very well. I can't speak for the quality of all of the others, only that most of the other readers are more susceptible to failure than the UPC reader. I suspect there are major improvements that could be made, if anyone knows anything about image processing. It's unfortunately a topic that although I'm interested in, I haven't had any time to delve into. And I'm probably a lot better at just maintaining and improving in general, moreso than fixing processing issues. :| |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: