Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance datasets APIs to accept all parameters of z/OSMF #178

Open
jordanCain opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Enhance datasets APIs to accept all parameters of z/OSMF #178

jordanCain opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jordanCain
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the solution you'd like
z/OSMF has extra parameters when creating a dataset,

Model for allocating datasets doesn't support storage class and other properties
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.izua700/IZUHPINFO_API_CreateDataSet.htm#CreateDataSet__Reqbod

Describe alternatives you've considered
Using z/OSMF APIs directly

Additional context
Originally raised here zowe/api-layer#900


Engineering team info (eg https://github.com/zowe/explorer-jes/issues/4)

As a [type of user],
I want [some goal]
so that [some reason].

Details/notes
[Detail - implementation notes]

Acceptance Criteria

*Scenario 1: [Title]
Given [context]
And [some more context]...
When [event]
Then [outcome]
 And [another outcome]...

@jordanCain
Copy link
Contributor Author

jordanCain commented Nov 4, 2020

@Destabilizator Can you inform on the priority of this? Could you tell us what it's blocking you from being able to do?

@Destabilizator
Copy link

I have to go directly to z/OSMF API instead of going through API ML, because I need to allocate datasets via STORCLAS.
My whole app runs behind API ML, so it's a bit weird to sometimes have to go around it :-/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants