Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ekdist -- exponentiated Kumaraswamy #1951

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JJNewkirk
Copy link

  • [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumaraswamy_distribution
  • The exponentiated Kumaraswamy Distribution and its log-transform: Lemonte et al https://www.jstor.org/stable/43601233
    I believe my functions are accurate; however in testing the mean of the current kumaraswamy.jl the did not match in some cases. I believe this to be an error in the kumaraswamy.jl in the version I was using. The EK distribution has the Kumaraswamy as a special case, so it is easy to test keeping gamma = 1.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 93 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.29%. Comparing base (e470421) to head (dfb8d8a).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/univariate/continuous/ekdist.jl 0.00% 93 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1951      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.19%   85.29%   -0.91%     
==========================================
  Files         146      147       +1     
  Lines        8768     8861      +93     
==========================================
  Hits         7558     7558              
- Misses       1210     1303      +93     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants