Update dependencies and fixes #106
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/error.rs (1)
26-27: Preserve underlying error details for better debugging.You’re discarding the original
Bolt11ParseErrordetails, making it harder to diagnose invoice parsing issues in production. Returning these details or logging them would help debugging.Here’s a potential approach to store a message from the error:
impl From<lightning_invoice::Bolt11ParseError> for MostroError { - fn from(_: lightning_invoice::Bolt11ParseError) -> Self { + fn from(err: lightning_invoice::Bolt11ParseError) -> Self { // Possibly log or store err in a variant MostroError::ParsingInvoiceError } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Cargo.toml(2 hunks)src/error.rs(1 hunks)src/lightning/mod.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/lightning/mod.rs (1)
2-2: Ensure consistent usage of the aliased invoice type throughout the codebase.This alias maps
Bolt11InvoicetoInvoice. Please verify that no references to the old type remain elsewhere in the project to avoid naming collisions or confusion.✅ Verification successful
Let me search for both the original type name and the aliased name to get a complete picture.
No naming conflicts or inconsistencies found with the Invoice type alias
The verification shows that:
- The
Bolt11Invoicetype is only imported once insrc/lightning/mod.rswith the aliasInvoice- All other occurrences of "Invoice" in the codebase are either:
- Using the aliased type from the single import
- Part of error type names (
ParsingInvoiceError,InvoiceExpiredError)- Part of command/action names or documentation strings
There are no conflicting imports or inconsistent usage of the type throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for leftover references to the old type name. rg -A 3 'use lightning_invoice::Invoice'Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of Bolt11Invoice or Invoice from lightning_invoice rg -l "lightning_invoice::(Bolt11Invoice|Invoice)" # Also search for direct usage of Bolt11Invoice type rg "Bolt11Invoice" # Check if there are other Invoice type imports or usages that might conflict rg "Invoice"Length of output: 1311
Cargo.toml (3)
40-40: Confirm thatlightning-invoiceversion “0.32.0” withstdfeatures is fully compatible.Updating from “0.23.0” to “0.32.0” introduces new error types (e.g.,
Bolt11ParseError). The changes insrc/error.rspartially address these updates, but confirm no further breaking changes or required migrations.
42-43: Check newly updated dependencies for potential side effects.Both
mostro-coreandbitcoin_hasheshave been updated; ensure they remain compatible. This might include verifying any new trait or method changes that impact your code.
24-25: Validate potential breaking changes from updated dependencies.Clap was upgraded to “4.0” and
nostr-sdkwas changed to “0.38.0” with new features. Please ensure that all command-line argument parsing and new feature gates remain compatible with the rest of the code.Use the following script to scan for references to removed or deprecated APIs:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the CLI implementation to verify the compatibility.
Let me try a different approach to check the CLI implementation.
Dependencies update appears safe to proceed
The verification of the codebase shows that:
- The Clap v4.0 usage is compatible as it only uses stable features (
ParserandSubcommand) that are well-established in v4.x.- The nostr-sdk usage is limited to the
prelude::*import across multiple files, and the requested features ("nip06", "nip44", "nip59") are only additive, not replacing any existing functionality.The CLI implementation follows a clean command pattern with proper argument parsing and no deprecated API usage is detected. The command structure and argument handling appear robust and well-maintained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to locate references to clap APIs that might be deprecated or renamed. rg -A 3 'use clap'Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the CLI implementation for any potential breaking changes ast-grep --pattern 'struct $_ { $$$ }' src/cli.rs # Also check for any command implementations ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ { $$$ }' src/cli.rsLength of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the CLI implementation file cat src/cli.rs # Also check for any usage of nostr-sdk features rg -A 3 'use nostr_sdk'Length of output: 15256
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependencies
clapto version 4.0nostr-sdkto version 0.38.0lightning-invoiceto version 0.32.0 withstdfeaturemostro-coreto version 0.6.23bitcoin_hashesto version 0.16.0Bug Fixes