-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 602
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
restore dpl: remove use of disallow_one_site_gaps #6718
restore dpl: remove use of disallow_one_site_gaps #6718
Conversation
…l-one-site" This reverts commit 1b67316. Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
@@ -305,8 +304,7 @@ void Grid::visitCellBoundaryPixels( | |||
} | |||
} | |||
if (!have_obstructions) { | |||
const auto grid_rect | |||
= padded ? gridCoveringPadded(&cell) : gridCovering(&cell); | |||
const auto grid_rect = gridCovering(&cell); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@maliberty @gadfort Here's the change to remove the padding from 1-site gap check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does it make sense to add a test for this behavior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try to reproduce it with a public PDK.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would imagine, a DEF with 2 inverters spaced 3 sites apart with a padding of 1 would be sufficient and check_placement (just need to remove all the x1 cells from the platforms)
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
@gadfort This fix was not enough for all designs. I'll go back to it in the weekend. |
switched to draft until you have this ready to go |
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
@maliberty I've updated DPO by adding a new struct to represent the blockages. With this struct, we can choose between the original and the padded position of a blockage. It worked in the design I was testing, and I started a secure-ci now. |
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
b8d386f
to
ee74f25
Compare
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eder Monteiro <[email protected]>
@maliberty I believe this is finally ready to merge. The last issue I had in the secure-ci is finally fixed with the latest commits. |
No description provided.