Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: reject empty blobs #219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

feat: reject empty blobs #219

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

tripodsan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

This PR will trigger a minor release when merged.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (48e6ce9) to head (3331259).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #219   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         8           
  Lines         1223      1226    +3     
  Branches         1         1           
=========================================
+ Hits          1223      1226    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tripodsan tripodsan merged commit a3900ef into main Apr 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@tripodsan tripodsan deleted the reject-empty-blobs branch April 23, 2024 09:46
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
# [2.5.0](v2.4.21...v2.5.0) (2024-04-23)

### Features

* reject empty blobs ([#219](#219)) ([a3900ef](a3900ef))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.5.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants