fix phind #793
fix phind #793
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Thank you for contribution. The diff is huge and I can't understand the code in |
|
This is a different approach to sending a prompt to Phind because Phind requires the
I found that the
So, one way to get the When the Phind Once the Phind chat window is open, we need to run a script to send the prompt, so that the network request is sent out and we can intercept it. For Phind, this is the script that needs to be run in the Phind chat window: Before running this script, we need to inject the These scripts are run when the request to Then, after running the After that, it will go back to the renderer, and PhindBot will send a request with the POST data received from I also done this way for https://yiyan.baidu.com/ after this is merge i will open another PR for yiyan because some codes is shared in this PR |
|
you may remove this line |
|
I tested it on macOS. Unfortunately, I can't get correct result. The chat window was created but the prompt was not send. I need more time to find the reason. Have you ever met this? |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several significant changes across multiple files. A new dependency, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/windows/phind/send.js (1)
6-6: Remove the trailing empty line.There's an empty line at the end of the file. While some style guides recommend an empty line at the end of files, it's not necessary and can be removed for consistency if it's not a part of your project's style guide.
Consider removing this empty line if it doesn't align with your project's coding standards.
src/windows/helper/inject.js (1)
1-7: Improve documentation and provide usage contextThe purpose and usage context of this function are not immediately clear from its implementation. Adding proper documentation would greatly improve maintainability and help prevent misuse.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment to explain:
- The function's purpose
- Parameters and their expected types
- Return value
- Any security considerations or usage restrictions
Example:
/** * Generates a string containing JavaScript code to inject a custom script into a web page. * * @param {string} script - The JavaScript code to be injected. * @returns {string} A string containing JavaScript code that, when executed, will inject the provided script. * * @warning This function should be used with caution as it can pose security risks if not properly sanitized. * Only use with trusted input and consider alternatives to dynamic script injection where possible. */ export function getInjectScript(script) { // ... (existing implementation) }src/components/BotSettings/PhindBotSettings.vue (1)
Line range hint
5-19: LGTM: Script section updated to support new login functionality.The changes in the script section align well with the PR objectives:
- The
Botimport and usage ofBot.getInstance()support the goal of making themainWindowglobal and accessible across files.- The focus on the
LoginSettingcomponent addresses the login interface issues mentioned in [BUG] phind为什么没有登录界面的选项 #763.- Removal of
settingsandbrandIdsimplifies the component, focusing it on login functionality.These changes should help resolve the Phind-related issues mentioned in the PR description.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of using
Bot.getInstance()for better code documentation:data() { return { - bot: Bot.getInstance(), + // Use singleton instance to ensure consistent global state + bot: Bot.getInstance(), }; },src/background.js (3)
160-160: Consider the implications of using a global variable formainWindowThe change from a local
mainWindowtoglobal.mainWindowallows access from other modules, which aligns with the PR objective. However, using global variables can lead to potential issues:
- It may make the code harder to test and reason about.
- It could introduce unexpected side effects if the global state is modified elsewhere.
To mitigate these risks:
- Consider using a singleton pattern or a centralized state management solution.
- Ensure that only necessary modules have access to modify
global.mainWindow.- Add safeguards to prevent accidental modifications of the global state.
Also applies to: 298-298, 302-302, 307-310, 313-313, 316-316, 321-321, 324-324, 328-331, 339-339
355-373: New chat window management functionality looks good, consider future extensibilityThe introduction of the
windowsobject and the new IPC handlers for creating and closing chat windows is a good improvement for managing multiple windows. Some observations and suggestions:
The
create-chat-windowhandler currently only handles the "phind" case. Consider adding a default case to handle unknown window types or prepare for future window types.The
close-chat-windowhandler correctly closes the window and removes the reference. Good practice!For better type checking and autocomplete, consider using JSDoc for the
windowsobject:/** @type {Record<string, Electron.BrowserWindow | undefined>} */ const windows = {};
- To improve error handling, consider adding a check in the
close-chat-windowhandler:if (!windows[winName]) { console.warn(`Attempted to close non-existent window: ${winName}`); return; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 361-361: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
Line range hint
298-339: Refactor token handling increateNewWindowfor better maintainability and securityThe
createNewWindowfunction now handles token extraction for multiple websites. While this achieves the desired functionality, there are some concerns:
Maintainability: As more websites are added, this function will grow and become harder to maintain. Consider refactoring this into a separate module with a map of website-specific handlers.
Security: Sending tokens directly through IPC messages might pose a security risk. Consider encrypting sensitive data before sending it through IPC.
Error Handling: Add try-catch blocks for each website-specific token extraction to prevent a failure in one from affecting others.
Consistency: Some sites use
getLocalStorage, others usegetCookie. Consider standardizing this approach if possible.Suggested refactor:
const tokenExtractors = { 'https://moss.fastnlp.top/': async () => ({ secret: await getLocalStorage('flutter.token') }), 'https://qianwen.aliyun.com/': async () => ({ token: await getCookie('XSRF-TOKEN') }), // ... other extractors ... }; async function extractTokens(url) { const domain = new URL(url).origin; const extractor = tokenExtractors[domain]; if (extractor) { try { const tokens = await extractor(); // Encrypt tokens here before sending global.mainWindow.webContents.send(`${domain}-TOKENS`, tokens); } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to extract tokens for ${domain}:`, error); } } } // In createNewWindow newWin.on('close', async (e) => { e.preventDefault(); await extractTokens(url); newWin.destroy(); global.mainWindow.webContents.send("CHECK-AVAILABILITY", url); });This approach improves maintainability, error handling, and prepares for future additions.
src/windows/phind/phind.js (1)
48-48: Handle possible exceptions when detaching the debugger.When detaching the debugger, an exception might occur if the debugger is not attached. It's advisable to check if the debugger is attached before detaching.
Apply this diff to safely detach the debugger:
win.on("closed", () => { - _debugger.detach(); + if (_debugger.isAttached()) { + try { + _debugger.detach(); + } catch (err) { + console.error('Failed to detach debugger:', err); + } + } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/background.js (7 hunks)
- src/bots/PhindBot.js (3 hunks)
- src/components/BotSettings/PhindBotSettings.vue (1 hunks)
- src/store/index.js (1 hunks)
- src/windows/helper/inject.js (1 hunks)
- src/windows/helper/waitForElement.js (1 hunks)
- src/windows/phind/phind.js (1 hunks)
- src/windows/phind/send.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/background.js
[error] 361-361: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
src/bots/PhindBot.js
[error] 61-61: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 63-63: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/windows/helper/inject.js (1)
1-7:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Potential XSS vulnerability in script injection
The
getInjectScriptfunction creates a string that, when executed, injects a provided script into the document. This approach can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if thescriptparameter is not properly sanitized.Consider the following improvements:
- Implement strict input validation and sanitization for the
scriptparameter.- Use a Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict script execution.
- If possible, avoid dynamic script injection altogether and use safer alternatives like event-driven communication between different parts of your application.
To assess the usage and potential impact of this function, let's search for its occurrences in the codebase:
src/components/BotSettings/PhindBotSettings.vue (1)
1-3: LGTM: Template simplified and focused on login functionality.The template has been streamlined to use a single
login-settingcomponent, which aligns with the PR objectives of addressing login-related issues (e.g., #763). This change centralizes the login logic and simplifies the component structure.package.json (1)
83-83: LGTM: Addition of raw-loader is appropriate.The addition of
raw-loader(version ^4.0.2) to thedevDependenciesis appropriate and aligns with the project's needs. This loader is commonly used to import files as raw strings in webpack, which could be beneficial for the Phind integration mentioned in the PR objectives.A few points to note:
raw-loaderis correctly placed indevDependenciesas it's a build-time dependency.- The version specifier
^4.0.2allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.- This addition suggests that the project now needs to import raw content, possibly related to the Phind feature implementation.
src/store/index.js (1)
115-115: LGTM. Verify impact and update documentation if needed.The simplification of the
phindproperty in the state object aligns with the PR objectives related to the Phind feature. This change provides more flexibility in how thephindstate is used.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions:
- Verify that no components or other parts of the application directly access
state.phind.model.- Update any relevant documentation or comments that might reference the removed
modelproperty.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful. No references to
state.phind.modelfound.The removal of the
modelproperty fromphinddoes not impact existing functionality. Please ensure that any related documentation or comments are updated accordingly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any direct references to state.phind.model rg "state\.phind\.model" --type vue --type jsLength of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any direct references to state.phind.model in .vue and .js files rg "state\.phind\.model" --glob "*.vue" --glob "*.js"Length of output: 55
src/windows/phind/phind.js (1)
38-39: Verify that 'global.mainWindow' is defined before using it.The code assumes that
global.mainWindowis defined and accessible. Ifglobal.mainWindowis undefined or not properly initialized, this could lead to runtime errors.Ensure that
global.mainWindowis correctly defined and initialized before this line.Run the following script to check if
global.mainWindowis defined:✅ Verification successful
Verified:
global.mainWindowis defined insrc/background.js, ensuring it is properly initialized before its usage inphind.js.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'global.mainWindow' is defined in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of 'global.mainWindow'. Expect: At least one occurrence where it's assigned. rg --type javascript --word-regexp 'global\.mainWindow\s*='Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'global.mainWindow' is defined in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of 'global.mainWindow'. Expect: At least one occurrence where it's assigned. rg --type js --word-regexp 'global\.mainWindow\s*='Length of output: 98
src/bots/PhindBot.js (1)
74-76: Verify the use of'readystatechange'event in SSEIn lines 74-76, the code adds an event listener for
'readystatechange'on the SSE source and checksevent.readyState. However,'readystatechange'is not a standard event forEventSourcein SSE, andevent.readyStatemay not be defined. Ensure that the SSE library (sse.js) you are using supports the'readystatechange'event and thatevent.readyStateprovides the expected values. If not, consider using standard SSE events such as'open','message', or'error'.
| waitForElement("textarea").then((e) => { | ||
| e.focus(); | ||
| document.execCommand("insertText", false, "{prompt}"); | ||
| waitForElement("button[type=submit]").then((e) => e.click(), console.error); | ||
| }, console.error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modernizing the code and improving error handling.
The current implementation uses promises and the deprecated document.execCommand method. Consider the following improvements:
- Replace
waitForElementwith a more modern approach, such as usingMutationObserveror async/await with a polling mechanism. - Instead of
document.execCommand, use the more modernElement.insertAdjacentText()or directly set thevalueproperty of the textarea. - Enhance error handling to provide more specific error messages and potentially implement retry logic.
Here's a suggested refactor using async/await and modern DOM manipulation:
async function waitForElement(selector, timeout = 5000) {
const start = Date.now();
while (Date.now() - start < timeout) {
const element = document.querySelector(selector);
if (element) return element;
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
}
throw new Error(`Element ${selector} not found within ${timeout}ms`);
}
async function insertTextAndSubmit(prompt) {
try {
const textarea = await waitForElement("textarea");
textarea.focus();
textarea.value = prompt;
const submitButton = await waitForElement("button[type=submit]");
submitButton.click();
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error in insertTextAndSubmit:", error.message);
}
}
insertTextAndSubmit("{prompt}");This refactored version provides better error handling, uses modern DOM manipulation, and is more readable.
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
| waitForElement("textarea").then((e) => { | |||
| e.focus(); | |||
| document.execCommand("insertText", false, "{prompt}"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid hardcoding the prompt value.
The current implementation uses a hardcoded "{prompt}" value. This might be a placeholder, but it's better to make it configurable.
Consider passing the prompt as a parameter or retrieving it from a configuration object. For example:
function insertTextAndSubmit(prompt) {
// ... existing code ...
document.execCommand("insertText", false, prompt);
// ... existing code ...
}
// Usage
insertTextAndSubmit(actualPromptValue);This change would make the function more flexible and reusable.
| export function getInjectScript(script) { | ||
| return ` | ||
| var script = document.createElement('script'); | ||
| var customScript = ${script}; | ||
| script.innerHTML = customScript; | ||
| document.head.appendChild(script);`; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring for improved robustness and maintainability
The current implementation could be improved to make it more robust and easier to maintain.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use template literals consistently:
export function getInjectScript(script) {
return `
(() => {
const script = document.createElement('script');
const customScript = ${JSON.stringify(script)};
script.textContent = customScript;
document.head.appendChild(script);
})();
`;
}- Add error handling:
export function getInjectScript(script) {
if (typeof script !== 'string' || script.trim() === '') {
throw new Error('Invalid script provided');
}
return `
(() => {
try {
const script = document.createElement('script');
const customScript = ${JSON.stringify(script)};
script.textContent = customScript;
document.head.appendChild(script);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to inject script:', error);
}
})();
`;
}These changes would make the function more resilient to errors and easier to debug.
| function waitForElement(selector) { | ||
| return new Promise((resolve) => { | ||
| if (document.querySelector(selector)) { | ||
| return resolve(document.querySelector(selector)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const observer = new MutationObserver((mutations) => { | ||
| if (document.querySelector(selector)) { | ||
| observer.disconnect(); | ||
| resolve(document.querySelector(selector)); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| observer.observe(document.body, { | ||
| childList: true, | ||
| subtree: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance robustness and reusability of waitForElement function
The waitForElement function is a good implementation for dynamically waiting for elements to appear in the DOM. However, there are a few improvements that could make it more robust and reusable:
- Add a timeout mechanism to prevent indefinite waiting, which could lead to memory leaks if the element never appears.
- Refactor repeated
document.querySelector(selector)calls to improve maintainability. - Export the function to make it available for use in other modules.
- Add error handling for invalid selectors.
Here's a suggested implementation incorporating these improvements:
export function waitForElement(selector, timeout = 5000) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const checkElement = () => document.querySelector(selector);
const element = checkElement();
if (element) {
return resolve(element);
}
const observer = new MutationObserver(() => {
const element = checkElement();
if (element) {
observer.disconnect();
resolve(element);
}
});
observer.observe(document.body, {
childList: true,
subtree: true,
});
setTimeout(() => {
observer.disconnect();
reject(new Error(`Timeout waiting for element: ${selector}`));
}, timeout);
});
}
// Usage example:
// waitForElement('#my-element', 10000)
// .then(element => console.log('Element found:', element))
// .catch(error => console.error(error));This implementation:
- Adds a configurable timeout.
- Refactors the repeated querySelector calls.
- Exports the function.
- Rejects the promise if the element isn't found within the timeout period.
- Includes a usage example for clarity.
Consider adding this utility function to a shared utilities module if it's likely to be used across multiple components or scripts in your application.
| @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ async function createWindow() { | |||
| }, | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| mainWindow = win; | |||
| global.mainWindow = win; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor createWindow for better separation of concerns and security
The createWindow function has been updated with new functionality, but there are some concerns:
-
Cookie Handling: Forcing SameSite to 'None' for all cookies can have security implications. This should be done selectively only for cookies that absolutely require it.
-
Function Length: The function is handling multiple concerns (window creation, cookie handling, request interception). Consider breaking these into separate functions for better maintainability.
-
Security: Modifying cookies and headers can potentially introduce security vulnerabilities. Ensure that these modifications are absolutely necessary and well-documented.
Suggestions:
- Extract cookie handling logic into a separate function:
function setupCookieHandling(win) {
win.webContents.session.cookies.on('changed', async (event, cookie, cause, removed) => {
// ... existing cookie handling logic ...
});
}- Extract request interception logic into a separate function:
function setupRequestInterception(win) {
win.webContents.session.webRequest.onBeforeSendHeaders((details, callback) => {
// ... existing request interception logic ...
});
}- Update
createWindow:
async function createWindow() {
const win = new BrowserWindow({
// ... existing options ...
});
global.mainWindow = win;
setupCookieHandling(win);
setupRequestInterception(win);
// ... rest of the function ...
}- Add comments explaining why certain security-sensitive operations (like modifying SameSite attributes) are necessary.
Also applies to: 164-209
| if (event.data) { | ||
| /** @type {{ "created": number, "model": string, "choices": [ { "index": number, "delta": { "role": string, "content": string } } ] }} */ | ||
| const response = JSON.parse(event.data); | ||
| if (response && response.choices && response.choices.length) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify conditions using optional chaining
The conditions in lines 61 and 63 can be simplified using optional chaining for better readability and conciseness.
Line 61:
- if (response && response.choices && response.choices.length) {
+ if (response?.choices?.length) {Line 63:
- if (choice.delta && choice.delta.content) {
+ if (choice.delta?.content) {Also applies to: 63-63
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 61-61: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| console.error(event); | ||
| reject(this.getSSEDisplayError(event)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure getSSEDisplayError method is implemented
In line 99, reject(this.getSSEDisplayError(event)); calls getSSEDisplayError(event), but it's unclear if this method is defined in the class or its parent classes. Ensure that getSSEDisplayError is implemented to correctly handle and display SSE error events.
| done: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| resolve(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| source.addEventListener("error", (event) => { | ||
| console.error(event); | ||
| reject(this.getSSEDisplayError(event)); | ||
| }); | ||
| source.stream(); | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| reject(err); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| let text = ""; | ||
| return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | ||
| ipcRenderer.once("phind-request", (_, postData) => | ||
| onPhindRequest(_, postData, text, resolve, reject), | ||
| ); | ||
| }) | ||
| .then(async () => { | ||
| ipcRenderer.invoke("close-chat-window", PhindBot._brandId); | ||
| let response; | ||
| if (context.chatId) { | ||
| response = await axios.put("https://www.phind.com/api/db/chat", { | ||
| chatId: context.chatId, | ||
| messages: context.message_history?.slice(-2), | ||
| }); | ||
| source.addEventListener("error", (event) => { | ||
| console.error(event); | ||
| reject(this.getSSEDisplayError(event)); | ||
| } else { | ||
| response = await axios.post("https://www.phind.com/api/db/chat", { | ||
| title: prompt, | ||
| messages: context.message_history?.slice(-2), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // override default _onStreamProgress to fix missing new line in response due to trimming | ||
| source._onStreamProgress = function (e) { | ||
| if (!source.xhr) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (source.xhr.status !== 200) { | ||
| source._onStreamFailure(e); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (source.readyState == source.CONNECTING) { | ||
| source.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent("open")); | ||
| source._setReadyState(source.OPEN); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var data = source.xhr.responseText.substring(source.progress); | ||
|
|
||
| source.progress += data.length; | ||
| var parts = (source.chunk + data).split(/\r\n\r\n/); | ||
| var lastPart = parts.pop(); | ||
| for (let part of parts) { | ||
| // skip if data is empty | ||
| if (part === "data: ") { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // newline | ||
| if (part === "data: \r\ndata: ") { | ||
| let event = new CustomEvent("message"); | ||
| event.data = "\n"; | ||
| source.dispatchEvent(event); | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const event = source._parseEventChunk(part); | ||
| source.dispatchEvent(event); | ||
| } | ||
| source.chunk = lastPart; | ||
| }; | ||
| source.stream(); | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| reject(err); | ||
| context.chatId = response.data; | ||
| this.setChatContext(context); | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| .catch((error) => { | ||
| console.error("Operation failed:", error); | ||
| ipcRenderer.invoke("close-chat-window", PhindBot._brandId); | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| if (error.request.status === 403) { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| `${error.request.status} ${error.request.responseText}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.error("Error PhindBot _sendPrompt:", error); | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor _sendPrompt method for improved maintainability
The _sendPrompt method is quite lengthy and contains nested functions and multiple asynchronous operations. For better readability and maintainability, consider refactoring this method into smaller, reusable helper functions. This will make the code easier to understand, test, and debug.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 61-61: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 63-63: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| }); | ||
| const onPhindRequest = (_, postData, text, resolve, reject) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const source = new SSE("https://https.api.phind.com/agent/", { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the URL in the SSE connection
In line 53, the SSE connection is initialized with an incorrect URL "https://https.api.phind.com/agent/". The domain seems to have an extra "https." prefix. The correct URL should likely be "https://api.phind.com/agent/". Verify and update the URL to prevent connection issues.
Apply this diff to fix the URL:
- const source = new SSE("https://https.api.phind.com/agent/", {
+ const source = new SSE("https://api.phind.com/agent/", {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const source = new SSE("https://https.api.phind.com/agent/", { | |
| const source = new SSE("https://api.phind.com/agent/", { |
| try { | ||
| const response = await axios.get( | ||
| "https://www.phind.com/api/auth/session", | ||
| ); | ||
| if (response?.data?.user?.userId) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error PhindBot check login:", error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure _checkAvailability consistently returns a boolean
In the _checkAvailability method, the try block returns true when the user is logged in. However, if an error occurs, the catch block logs the error but doesn't return a value. This can result in the method returning undefined instead of false, which may cause unexpected behavior. Consider returning false at the end of the method to ensure it always returns a boolean.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error PhindBot check login:", error);
+ return false;
}
+ return false;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| const response = await axios.get( | |
| "https://www.phind.com/api/auth/session", | |
| ); | |
| if (response?.data?.user?.userId) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error PhindBot check login:", error); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await axios.get( | |
| "https://www.phind.com/api/auth/session", | |
| ); | |
| if (response?.data?.user?.userId) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error PhindBot check login:", error); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@asyncButNeverAwaits would you like to continue working on this PR? Thanks!
make mainWindow as global to use in other file
phind need to generate challenge seed which is dynamic only can open the phind window and get the seend
Close: #763
Close: #701
Close: #690
Close: #623
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
raw-loaderfor enhanced functionality.LoginSettingcomponent for simplified bot login configuration.Bug Fixes
Refactor
PhindBotclass for better API interaction and chat context management.