upstream header fixes

[thehesiod]

fix to #1300

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.84%. Comparing base (6437c89) to head (3f15b21).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1301      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.84%   89.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          67       67              
  Lines        6087     6086       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5469     5468       -1     
  Misses        618      618              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.84% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thehesiod]

btw ran the local only tests as well and they passed

[thehesiod]

hmm, perhaps we should try publishing a dev version of this for people to test with?

[jakob-keller]

hmm, perhaps we should try publishing a dev version of this for people to test with?

Sounds reasonable, but I have no experience with it. Would you expect a significant amount of people to notice and participate?

[jakob-keller]

As expected, the arm64 job on Python 3.8 is still flaky, but since we marked it as experimental, that does not block the PR. You could merge it now, if you like.

[thehesiod]

hmm, perhaps we should try publishing a dev version of this for people to test with?

Sounds reasonable, but I have no experience with it. Would you expect a significant amount of people to notice and participate?

I'm thinking someone in that discussion group linked, had a post recently: #1300. Let me change this to a dev version instead then

[jakob-keller]

I'm thinking someone in that discussion group linked, had a post recently: #1300. Let me change this to a dev version instead then

They could get the wheel from https://github.com/aio-libs/aiobotocore/actions/runs/13508980065 without us having to publish to PyPI.

[jakob-keller]

Let me change this to a dev version instead then

Thinking about it, I don't think our CI will work for a dev release. For starters, the CI trigger would not even fire:

aiobotocore/.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml

Line 11 in 7cb07f6

[0-9]+.[0-9]+.[0-9]+

[thehesiod]

Let me change this to a dev version instead then

Thinking about it, I don't think our CI will work for a dev release. For starters, the CI trigger would not even fire:

aiobotocore/.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml

Line 11 in 7cb07f6

[0-9]+.[0-9]+.[0-9]+

fixed (theoretically)