Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: nodekit version at top #149

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

tasosbit
Copy link
Contributor

ℹ Overview

  • Adds nodekit version within the TUI at top left

✅ Acceptance:

  • Pre-commit checks pass

@tasosbit tasosbit changed the base branch from main to v1.2.2 February 12, 2025 15:27
@tasosbit tasosbit requested a review from PhearZero February 12, 2025 15:28
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.19048% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.69%. Comparing base (5c60f9b) to head (9183a54).
Report is 10 commits behind head on v1.2.2.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/root.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
ui/style/style.go 85.71% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/bootstrap.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
internal/algod/state.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           v1.2.2     #149       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   32.63%   43.69%   +11.05%     
===========================================
  Files          76       76               
  Lines        6342     6451      +109     
===========================================
+ Hits         2070     2819      +749     
+ Misses       4160     3400      -760     
- Partials      112      232      +120     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tasosbit tasosbit merged commit 37310d0 into v1.2.2 Feb 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@tasosbit tasosbit deleted the feat/nodekit-version-at-top branch February 12, 2025 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants