Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP]test: increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module #6777

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

l81893521
Copy link
Contributor

  • I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.68%. Comparing base (363e179) to head (94b523d).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6777      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     52.66%   52.68%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     6571     6575       +4     
============================================
  Files          1125     1125              
  Lines         39923    39923              
  Branches       4677     4675       -2     
============================================
+ Hits          21026    21033       +7     
+ Misses        16898    16892       -6     
+ Partials       1999     1998       -1     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@l81893521 l81893521 changed the title test: increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module wip: increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module Aug 25, 2024
@slievrly slievrly changed the title wip: increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module [WIP]test: increate the code coverage of the rm-datasource module Aug 31, 2024
@slievrly
Copy link
Member

slievrly commented Nov 5, 2024

@l81893521 It seems that this change did not help improve test coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants