Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added loop step #165

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Added loop step #165

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

Akhilathina
Copy link
Contributor

@Akhilathina Akhilathina commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced Loop class to support iterative and parallel step execution.
    • Added capability to process steps over lists or specified counts.
    • Implemented flexible execution modes (sequential and parallel).
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced step processing with advanced error handling.
    • Supports asynchronous execution of multiple steps.
    • Provides configurable loop parameters for complex workflows.
  • Version Update

    • Updated project version from 1.7.7 to 1.7.10.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Akhilathina has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc7a294 and 2043621.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces the Loop class in the athina/steps/loop.py module, which extends the existing Step class. This class provides functionality for managing loop execution with attributes for loop configuration and includes several asynchronous methods for executing steps either in parallel or sequentially. The __init__.py file is updated to import and export the new Loop class. Additionally, the project version is updated in the pyproject.toml file.

Changes

File Change Summary
athina/steps/__init__.py Added import and export of Loop from athina.steps.loop module
athina/steps/loop.py Introduced Loop class with methods for async execution, sequence processing, and loop control
pyproject.toml Updated project version from 1.7.7 to 1.7.10

Possibly related PRs

  • Spider crawl step #140: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the athina/steps/__init__.py file, specifically adding new classes to the __all__ list, similar to the addition of the Loop class in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • vivek-athina

Poem

🐰 In the realm of loops, we hop and play,
With steps that dance in a seamless array,
Async whispers guide our way,
CodeRabbit's Loop leads the fray,
Executing dreams, come what may! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
athina/steps/loop.py (5)

2-2: Remove unnecessary import of typing.Any.
It is currently unused and flagged by Ruff (F401).

-from typing import Dict, List, Any, Optional
+from typing import Dict, List, Optional
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

2-2: typing.Any imported but unused

Remove unused import: typing.Any

(F401)


4-4: Remove unused import of pydantic.ConfigDict.
It is not referenced in this file and flagged by Ruff (F401).

-from pydantic import ConfigDict
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

4-4: pydantic.ConfigDict imported but unused

Remove unused import: pydantic.ConfigDict

(F401)


5-5: Remove unused imports from athina.steps.code_execution_v2.
They are flagged by Ruff (F401) for being unused in this file.

-from athina.steps.code_execution_v2 import CodeExecutionV2, EXECUTION_E2B
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

5-5: athina.steps.code_execution_v2.CodeExecutionV2 imported but unused

Remove unused import

(F401)


5-5: athina.steps.code_execution_v2.EXECUTION_E2B imported but unused

Remove unused import

(F401)


144-144: Address spacing around the equals sign.
Triggered a linter warning: "Unexpected spaces around keyword/parameter equals."

Ensure the parameter is in the format count=count without extra spaces:

- results = await self._process_count(count = count, inputs = inputs, semaphore = semaphore)
+ results = await self._process_count(count=count, inputs=inputs, semaphore=semaphore)
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Python Linter

[warning] 144-144: Unexpected spaces around keyword/parameter equals


188-188: Add a newline at the end of file.
Some linters and tools expect the file to end with a newline.

  "metadata": {},
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Python Linter

[warning] 188-188: No newline at end of file

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de3d23f and 13ec978.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • athina/steps/__init__.py (2 hunks)
  • athina/steps/loop.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
athina/steps/loop.py

2-2: typing.Any imported but unused

Remove unused import: typing.Any

(F401)


4-4: pydantic.ConfigDict imported but unused

Remove unused import: pydantic.ConfigDict

(F401)


5-5: athina.steps.code_execution_v2.CodeExecutionV2 imported but unused

Remove unused import

(F401)


5-5: athina.steps.code_execution_v2.EXECUTION_E2B imported but unused

Remove unused import

(F401)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Python Linter
athina/steps/loop.py

[warning] 144-144: Unexpected spaces around keyword/parameter equals


[warning] 188-188: No newline at end of file

🔇 Additional comments (2)
athina/steps/__init__.py (2)

5-5: Import statement for LoopStep appears correct.
No issues found.


46-46: Properly exporting LoopStep in __all__.
The newly added entry for LoopStep aligns with the class name and usage.

athina/steps/loop.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
athina/steps/loop.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
athina/steps/loop.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
athina/steps/loop.py (1)

84-95: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve event loop management and error handling.

The current event loop management approach has issues as noted in previous reviews. Also, error handling needs improvement.

 def execute(self, inputs: Dict) -> Dict:
     """Handles execution, avoiding issues with already running event loops."""
+    if not inputs:
+        return {"status": "error", "data": "No inputs provided", "metadata": {}}
+
     try:
-        loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
-        if loop.is_running():
-            future = asyncio.ensure_future(self._execute_loop(inputs))
-            loop.run_until_complete(future)
-            return future.result()
-        else:
-            return asyncio.run(self._execute_loop(inputs))
+        return asyncio.run(self._execute_loop(inputs))
     except Exception as e:
-        return {"status": "error", "data": str(e), "metadata": {}}
+        error_message = f"Loop execution failed: {str(e)}"
+        return {
+            "status": "error",
+            "data": error_message,
+            "metadata": {
+                "error_type": e.__class__.__name__,
+                "traceback": traceback.format_exc()
+            }
+        }

Don't forget to add the import:

+import traceback
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
athina/steps/loop.py (2)

1-4: Remove unused import.

The Any type from typing is imported but never used in the code.

-from typing import Dict, List, Any, Optional
+from typing import Dict, List, Optional
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

2-2: typing.Any imported but unused

Remove unused import: typing.Any

(F401)


8-13: Add type validation and documentation for class attributes.

The class attributes would benefit from:

  1. Type validation in init to ensure valid values for loop_type and execution_mode
  2. Documentation for valid values and constraints

Add validation like this:

def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
    super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
    valid_loop_types = {"map", "count"}
    valid_execution_modes = {"parallel", "sequential"}
    
    if self.loop_type not in valid_loop_types:
        raise ValueError(f"loop_type must be one of {valid_loop_types}")
    if self.execution_mode and self.execution_mode not in valid_execution_modes:
        raise ValueError(f"execution_mode must be one of {valid_execution_modes}")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13ec978 and 73bb32e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • athina/steps/__init__.py (2 hunks)
  • athina/steps/loop.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • athina/steps/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
athina/steps/loop.py

2-2: typing.Any imported but unused

Remove unused import: typing.Any

(F401)

athina/steps/loop.py Show resolved Hide resolved
athina/steps/loop.py Show resolved Hide resolved
athina/steps/loop.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@vivek-athina vivek-athina merged commit b0ffd44 into main Jan 30, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants