-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
e2e test for KafkaTopic webhook #1031
Draft
mihaialexandrescu
wants to merge
9
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
e2etest/webhook_kafkatopic
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
205bb67
webhook test logic with temporary structure until kubeconfig PR gets …
mihaialexandrescu 02700a1
fix typo in root kafkatopic validator; same typo cannot yet be fixed …
mihaialexandrescu 7208e1b
split some function calls into new lines better
mihaialexandrescu 111d82c
refactor Apply-type functions
mihaialexandrescu 8a0926f
refactor kafkatopic webhook test case data
mihaialexandrescu cf9faef
update to go.mod and go.sum in root and tests/e2e after tidy
mihaialexandrescu 34483c4
update testcase logic; temporary commit - needs cleanup
mihaialexandrescu 651a2c8
update testcase logic; use local kafkatopic struct; use local tempfil…
mihaialexandrescu d21676d
remove kafkaCluster parameter from testWebhookKafkaTopic()
mihaialexandrescu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note:
When we use the emperror.dev/errors's WithDetails feature then IMHO the error message will not contain the details because it is stored in a separate structure member variable and not in the error message itself.
I think we should figure out something to solve this problem.
I favor the std Go error handling with the fmt.Errorf but I know the stacktrace will be not there. (it is also stored in a separate struct member variable in emperror case)
I know we use that lot of places in the e2e codebase