Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

blog about new mouse atlases #281

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

blog about new mouse atlases #281

merged 10 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

alessandrofelder
Copy link
Member

@alessandrofelder alessandrofelder commented Feb 5, 2025

Description

What is this PR

  • Bug fix
  • Addition of a new feature
  • Other

What does this PR do?

I've kept things as simple as possible, just to give a top-level idea of the new mouse atlases we've recently added.

@alessandrofelder
Copy link
Member Author

@carlocastoldi this is a WIP blog - but just flagging that I'd like your review on the KimDevCCF part (which is currently the only one that is fleshed out) and the confirmation you're happy to be a co-author, when you have a moment, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@adamltyson adamltyson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some notes just because I happened to be taking a look. I'll review properly when it's done :)

@carlocastoldi
Copy link

Hi!

I am sorry for my late reply, i had some busy days.
That said, I like the tone and that it's a quick post, but covers the main question. Namely, why adding an additional developmental mouse atlas.

Lately, however, I have been thinking whether making an atlas for each reference image was the correct approach. Only recently I discovered that BrainGlobe API also support for additional_references. Using them feels like the better and correct approach, don't you think?

@adamltyson
Copy link
Member

Lately, however, I have been thinking whether making an atlas for each reference image was the correct approach. Only recently I discovered that BrainGlobe API also support for additional_references. Using them feels like the better and correct approach, don't you think?

Yes, that probably would have been better. It would depend on the size of the atlases though. The "original" version of the P56 dev atlas was split up into different atlases because otherwise the packaged atlas was too large (>10 GB).

@alessandrofelder alessandrofelder marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 11:50
Copy link
Member

@adamltyson adamltyson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is really nice @alessandrofelder, thanks! Quite a few comments though, sorry!


**Figure 3. A visualisation of both the LSFM (top row) and MRI (bottom row) templates and their annotations contained in Gubra's multimodal mouse brain atlas. Note that both modes are available at 25um, but the LSFM is slightly smaller due to shrinkage effects of sample preparation for LSFM.**

[Perens et al](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09623-9) created a multimodal atlas of the mouse brain, in collaboration with Gubra, a Danish biotech company. It contains both a MRI and a LSFM template at 25 micrometer resolution (`perens_stereotaxic_mri_mouse_25um` and `perens_multimodal_lsfm_25um`, respectively), with annotations based on the Allen Mouse Brain atlas. This atlas enables the linking of in-vivo (MRI) data with ex-vivo (LSFM) data in atlas space.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some changes because a) Johanna (Perens) works for Gubra, so it's not really "in collaboration with", and also because these atlases are in different coordinate spaces, it doesn't (yet) allow the user to link in/ex vivo within BrainGlobe.

Suggested change
[Perens et al](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09623-9) created a multimodal atlas of the mouse brain, in collaboration with Gubra, a Danish biotech company. It contains both a MRI and a LSFM template at 25 micrometer resolution (`perens_stereotaxic_mri_mouse_25um` and `perens_multimodal_lsfm_25um`, respectively), with annotations based on the Allen Mouse Brain atlas. This atlas enables the linking of in-vivo (MRI) data with ex-vivo (LSFM) data in atlas space.
[Perens et al.](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09623-9) created a multimodal atlas of the mouse brain containing both an MRI and an LSFM template at 25 micrometer resolution (`perens_stereotaxic_mri_mouse_25um` and `perens_multimodal_lsfm_25um`, respectively), with annotations based on the Allen Mouse Brain atlas.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would also like a line highlighting that the MRI atlas is stereotaxic.

"The MRI template is in flat skull position, and is able to be used for planning stereotaxic surgeries."

Also makes me think one day stereotaxic atlases in braingllobe should perhaps have a bregma and lambda metadata field but that's something to consider in the future.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @PolarBean - I've added a sentence along those lines. Are you happy for this to be merged now?


## Gubra's Multimodal 3D mouse brain atlas

```{image} ./images/gubra_multimodal.png
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This image isn't super useful. You can't really see anything in the MRI and LSFM templates. I would stick with a 2D version.


**Figure 1. LSFM templates for embryonic developmental stages (from left to right: E11.5, E13.5, E15.5, E18.5) available in the Kim DevCCF.**

![Coronal sections for all templates for Kim DevCCF template at E18.5](./images/kim_dev_embryonic_18_all_modalities_2d.png)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this figure be cropped a bit to make the brains bigger? Also, the bottom right image (ADC?) should be adjusted a bit, you can't see anything in the brain!

Co-authored-by: Adam Tyson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Harry Carey <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@PolarBean PolarBean left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. Minor feedback.


**Figure 3. A visualisation of both the LSFM (top row) and MRI (bottom row) templates and their annotations contained in Gubra's multimodal mouse brain atlas. Note that both modes are available at 25um, but the LSFM is slightly smaller due to shrinkage effects of sample preparation for LSFM.**

[Perens et al](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09623-9) created a multimodal atlas of the mouse brain, in collaboration with Gubra, a Danish biotech company. It contains both a MRI and a LSFM template at 25 micrometer resolution (`perens_stereotaxic_mri_mouse_25um` and `perens_multimodal_lsfm_25um`, respectively), with annotations based on the Allen Mouse Brain atlas. This atlas enables the linking of in-vivo (MRI) data with ex-vivo (LSFM) data in atlas space.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would also like a line highlighting that the MRI atlas is stereotaxic.

"The MRI template is in flat skull position, and is able to be used for planning stereotaxic surgeries."

Also makes me think one day stereotaxic atlases in braingllobe should perhaps have a bregma and lambda metadata field but that's something to consider in the future.

@alessandrofelder alessandrofelder changed the title Mouse blog blog about new mouse atlases Feb 20, 2025
@adamltyson adamltyson merged commit 909919c into main Feb 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@adamltyson adamltyson deleted the mouse-blog branch February 20, 2025 17:02
@carlocastoldi
Copy link

Thank you all for the amazing work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants